Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guanming Yao
dblp:358/4809
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › learning from human feedback
AI feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from human feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.8best-of-n sampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ULTRAFEEDBACK: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI FeedbackabstractLearning from human feedback has become a pivot technique in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, acquiring vast and premium human feedback is bottlenecked by time, labor, and human capability, resulting in small sizes or limited topics of current datasets. This further hinders feedback learning as well as alignment research within the open-source community. To address this issue, we explore how to go beyond human feedback and collect high-quality AI feedback automatically for a scalable alternative. Specifically, we identify scale and diversity as the key factors for feedback data to take effect. Accordingly, we first broaden instructions and responses in both amount and breadth to encompass a wider range of user-assistant interactions. Then, we meticulously apply a series of techniques to mitigate annotation biases for more reliable AI feedback. We finally present UltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset, which contains over 1 million GPT-4 feedback for 250k user-assistant conversations from various aspects. Built upon UltraFeedback, we align a LLaMA-based model by best-of-$n$ sampling and reinforcement learning, demonstrating its exceptional performance on chat benchmarks. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models, serving as a solid foundation for future feedback learning research. Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Ning Ding 0002, Guanming Yao, Bingxiang He, Wei Zhu 0016, Yuan Ni, Guo Tong Xie, Ruobing Xie, Yankai Lin 0001, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Maosong Sun 0001 |
ICML | 4 |