Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emma Harvey

dblp:358/5793 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-AI interaction · 33% Wearable and physiological sensing · 29% Design research and methods · 29%
Network and information security
2 papers
Web and mobile security · 77% Usable security · 12% Network security · 11%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 79% Language models and text generation · 21%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.012026
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems · CHI 2026
Recommender systems
fairness-aware recommendation
1.012026
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems · CHI 2026
Wearable and physiological sensing
motion capture
0.812024
The Cadaver in the Machine: The Social Practices of Measurement and Validation in Motion Capture Technology · CHI 2024
Web and mobile security › mobile security
SMS security
0.812024
Poster: A Comprehensive Categorization of SMS Scams · IMC 2024
Empirical software engineering › practitioner studies
practitioner interview study
0.312026
Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems · CHI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
"Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in Education · CHI 2025
Usable security › deception
user deception
0.312025
'Hey mum, I dropped my phone down the toilet': Investigating Hi Mum and Dad SMS Scams in the United Kingdom · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Network security › content filtering
spam filtering
0.212024
Poster: A Comprehensive Categorization of SMS Scams · IMC 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thematic analysis · 3.0semi-structured interviews · 3.0systematic literature review · 0.8social practice theory · 0.8message classification · 0.8empirical measurement · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems
abstract
Recommender systems (RS), which are widely deployed across high-stakes domains, are susceptible to biases that can cause large-scale societal impacts. Researchers have proposed methods to measure and mitigate such biases—but translating academic theory into practice is inherently challenging. Through a semi-structured interview study (N=11), we map the RS practitioner workflow within large technology companies, focusing on how technical teams consider fairness internally and in collaboration with legal, data, and fairness teams. We identify key challenges to incorporating fairness into existing RS workflows: defining fairness in RS contexts, balancing multi-stakeholder interests, and navigating dynamic environments. We also identify key organization-wide challenges: making time for fairness work and facilitating cross-team communication. Finally, we offer actionable recommendations for the RS community, including practitioners and HCI researchers.
Jing Nathan Yan, Emma Harvey, Junxiong Wang, Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Allison Koenecke
CHI2
2025 Evaluating an AI Tutor for Bias Across Different Foundation Models
Aditya Vinodh, Emma Harvey, Husni Almoubayyed, Renzhe Yu, Christopher Brooks 0001, Allison Koenecke, René F. Kizilcec
AIED (6)2
2025 "Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in Education
Emma Harvey, Allison Koenecke, René F. Kizilcec
CHI1
2025 Understanding Predictive Models of Student Success with a Multiverse Analysis
Yunxuan Tang, Emma Harvey, Chengyuan Yao, Renzhe Yu, René F. Kizilcec, Christopher Brooks 0001
EDM2
2025 'Hey mum, I dropped my phone down the toilet': Investigating Hi Mum and Dad SMS Scams in the United Kingdom
Sharad Agarwal, Emma Harvey, Enrico Mariconti, Guillermo Suarez-Tangil, Marie Vasek
USENIX Security Symposium2
2024 The Cadaver in the Machine: The Social Practices of Measurement and Validation in Motion Capture Technology
abstract
Motion capture systems, used across various domains, make body representations concrete through technical processes. We argue that the measurement of bodies and the validation of measurements for motion capture systems can be understood as social practices. By analyzing the findings of a systematic literature review (N=278) through the lens of social practice theory, we show how these practices, and their varying attention to errors, become ingrained in motion capture design and innovation over time. Moreover, we show how contemporary motion capture systems perpetuate assumptions about human bodies and their movements. We suggest that social practices of measurement and validation are ubiquitous in the development of data- and sensor-driven systems more broadly, and provide this work as a basis for investigating hidden design assumptions and their potential negative consequences in human-computer interaction.
Emma Harvey, Hauke Sandhaus, Abigail Z. Jacobs, Emanuel Moss, Mona Sloane
CHI1
2024 Poster: A Comprehensive Categorization of SMS Scams
abstract
SMS scams have surged over the recent years. However, little empirical research has been done to understand this rising threat due to the lack of an updated dataset. In the UK, mobile network operators run a firewall to block illicit messages. To this end, we collaborate with a major UK mobile network operator, which provides us with 3.58m SMS messages flagged by their firewall. These messages originated from over 42k unique sender IDs and were sent to 2.23m mobile numbers between December 2023 and February 2024. This is the first research to examine the current threats in the SMS ecosystem and categorize illicit SMS messages into eight sectors, including spam. We present the distribution of SMS messages successfully blocked by the mobile network operator's firewall and those that successfully evade detection.
Sharad Agarwal, Emma Harvey, Marie Vasek
IMC2