Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiangyan Feng

dblp:358/7094 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 64% Language models and text generation · 17% Image recognition and object detection · 14%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment
0.912025
Re-Aligning Language to Visual Objects with an Agentic Workflow · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.912025
Re-Aligning Language to Visual Objects with an Agentic Workflow · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
language-based object detection
0.912025
Re-Aligning Language to Visual Objects with an Agentic Workflow · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Re-Aligning Language to Visual Objects with an Agentic Workflow · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.312025
Re-Aligning Language to Visual Objects with an Agentic Workflow · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.6large language model · 1.6agentic workflow · 0.9data generation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Re-Aligning Language to Visual Objects with an Agentic Workflow
abstract
Language-based object detection (LOD) aims to align visual objects with language expressions. A large amount of paired data is utilized to improve LOD model generalizations. During the training process, recent studies leverage vision-language models (VLMs) to automatically generate human-like expressions for visual objects, facilitating training data scaling up. In this process, we observe that VLM hallucinations bring inaccurate object descriptions (e.g., object name, color, and shape) to deteriorate VL alignment quality. To reduce VLM hallucinations, we propose an agentic workflow controlled by an LLM to re-align language to visual objects via adaptively adjusting image and text prompts. We name this workflow Real-LOD, which includes planning, tool use, and reflection steps. Given an image with detected objects and VLM raw language expressions, Real-LOD reasons its state automatically and arranges action based on our neural symbolic designs (i.e., planning). The action will adaptively adjust the image and text prompts and send them to VLMs for object re-description (i.e., tool use). Then, we use another LLM to analyze these refined expressions for feedback (i.e., reflection). These steps are conducted in a cyclic form to gradually improve language descriptions for re-aligning to visual objects. We construct a dataset that contains a tiny amount of 0.18M images with re-aligned language expression and train a prevalent LOD model to surpass existing LOD methods by around 50% on the standard benchmarks. Our Real-LOD workflow, with automatic VL refinement, reveals a potential to preserve data quality along with scaling up data quantity, which further improves LOD performance from a data-alignment perspective.
Jiangyan Feng, Lijun Gong, Feng Zhu 0006, Rui Zhao 0001, Qibin Hou, Ming-Ming Cheng, Yibing Song
ICLR2
2024 InstructDET: Diversifying Referring Object Detection with Generalized Instructions
abstract
We propose InstructDET, a data-centric method for referring object detection (ROD) that localizes target objects based on user instructions. While deriving from referring expressions (REC), the instructions we leverage are greatly diversified to encompass common user intentions related to object detection. For one image, we produce tremendous instructions that refer to every single object and different combinations of multiple objects. Each instruction and its corresponding object bounding boxes (bbxs) constitute one training data pair. In order to encompass common detection expressions, we involve emerging vision-language model (VLM) and large language model (LLM) to generate instructions guided by text prompts and object bbxs, as the generalizations of foundation models are effective to produce human-like expressions (e.g., describing object property, category, and relationship). We name our constructed dataset as InDET. It contains images, bbxs and generalized instructions that are from foundation models. Our InDET is developed from existing REC datasets and object detection datasets, with the expanding potential that any image with object bbxs can be incorporated through using our InstructDET method. By using our InDET dataset, we show that a conventional ROD model surpasses existing methods on standard REC datasets and our InDET test set. Our data-centric method InstructDET, with automatic data expansion by leveraging foundation models, directs a promising field that ROD can be greatly diversified to execute common object detection instructions.
Ronghao Dang, Jiangyan Feng, Chongjian Ge, Lin Song 0002, Lijun Gong, Feng Zhu 0006, Rui Zhao 0001, Yibing Song
ICLR2