EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregory Kang Ruey Lau
dblp:358/7226
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 39% Language models and text generation · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
inverse problem |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PIED: Physics-Informed Experimental Design for Inverse Problems · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selection · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selection · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selection · ICLR 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
data provenance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Waterfall: Scalable Framework for Robust Text Watermarking and Provenance for LLMs · EMNLP 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking
text watermarking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Waterfall: Scalable Framework for Robust Text Watermarking and Provenance for LLMs · EMNLP 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Waterfall: Scalable Framework for Robust Text Watermarking and Provenance for LLMs · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Quantum Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Quantum Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Quantum Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
quantum bandit algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Quantum Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Dipper: Diversity in Prompts for Producing Large Language Model Ensembles in Reasoning Tasks · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Quantum Bayesian Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural tangent kernel · 1.5quantum gaussian process upper confidence bound · 1.3confidence ellipsoid analysis · 1.3prompt optimization · 0.9physics-informed neural networks · 0.9meta-learning · 0.9batch inference · 0.9paraphrasing · 0.8large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dipper: Diversity in Prompts for Producing Large Language Model Ensembles in Reasoning TasksabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs), particularly smaller variants, still struggle with complex reasoning tasks.While inference-time prompting can guide reasoning, existing methods often rely on sequential queries.Ensemble approaches offer a promising path to performance gains, especially given recent batch inference speed-ups.This work introduces DIPPER, a novel, training-free framework that transforms a single LLM into an effective inference-time ensemble.By feeding the model an optimized and diverse set of prompts in parallel, DIPPER elicits varied reasoning paths, leading to performance gains.We empirically demonstrate significant improvements on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, such as MATH, where a DIP-PER ensemble of three Qwen2-MATH-1.5Binstances (via parallel prompting of a single model) outperforms a larger 7B model. Wenyang Hu, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Diwen Liu, Jizhuo Chen, See-Kiong Ng, Kian Hsiang Low |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | PIED: Physics-Informed Experimental Design for Inverse ProblemsabstractIn many science and engineering settings, system dynamics are characterized by governing partial differential equations (PDEs), and a major challenge is to solve inverse problems (IPs) where unknown PDE parameters are inferred based on observational data gathered under limited budget.
Due to the high costs of setting up and running experiments, experimental design (ED) is often done with the help of PDE simulations to optimize for the most informative design parameters (e.g., sensor placements) to solve such IPs, prior to actual data collection. This process of optimizing design parameters is especially critical when the budget and other practical constraints make it infeasible to adjust the design parameters between trials during the experiments.
However, existing experimental design (ED) methods tend to require sequential and frequent design parameter adjustments between trials. Furthermore, they also have significant computational bottlenecks due to the need for complex numerical simulations for PDEs, and do not exploit the advantages provided by physics informed neural networks (PINNs) in solving IPs for PDE-governed systems, such as its meshless solutions, differentiability, and amortized training.
This work presents Physics-Informed Experimental Design (PIED), the first ED framework that makes use of PINNs in a fully differentiable architecture to perform continuous optimization of design parameters for IPs for one-shot deployments.
PIED overcomes existing methods' computational bottlenecks through parallelized computation and meta-learning of PINN parameter initialization, and proposes novel methods to effectively take into account PINN training dynamics in optimizing the ED parameters.
Through experiments based on noisy simulated data and even real world experimental data, we empirically show that given limited observation budget, PIED significantly outperforms existing ED methods in solving IPs, including for challenging settings where the inverse parameters are unknown functions rather than just finite-dimensional. Apivich Hemachandra, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, See-Kiong Ng, Kian Hsiang Low |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Waterfall: Scalable Framework for Robust Text Watermarking and Provenance for LLMsabstractProtecting intellectual property (IP) of text such as articles and code is increasingly important, especially as sophisticated attacks become possible, such as paraphrasing by large language models (LLMs) or even unauthorized training of LLMs on copyrighted text to infringe such IP.However, existing text watermarking methods are not robust enough against such attacks nor scalable to millions of users for practical implementation.In this paper, we propose WA-TERFALL, the first training-free framework for robust and scalable text watermarking applicable across multiple text types (e.g., articles, code) and languages supportable by LLMs, for general text and LLM data provenance.WA-TERFALL comprises several key innovations, such as being the first to use LLM as paraphrasers for watermarking along with a novel combination of techniques that are surprisingly effective in achieving robust verifiability and scalability.We empirically demonstrate that WATERFALL achieves significantly better scalability, robust verifiability, and computational efficiency compared to SOTA article-text watermarking methods, and also showed how it could be directly applied to the watermarking of code.Our code is available at https: //github.com/aoi3142/Waterfall. Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Xinyuan Niu 0001, Hieu Dao, Jiangwei Chen 0001, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Kian Hsiang Low |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selectionabstractPhysics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), which incorporate PDEs as soft constraints, train with a composite loss function that contains multiple training point types: different types of collocation points chosen during training to enforce each PDE and initial/boundary conditions, and experimental points which are usually costly to obtain via experiments or simulations. Training PINNs using this loss function is challenging as it typically requires selecting large numbers of points of different types, each with different training dynamics. Unlike past works that focused on the selection of either collocation or experimental points, this work introduces PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selection (PINNACLE), the first algorithm that jointly optimizes the selection of all training point types, while automatically adjusting the proportion of collocation point types as training progresses. PINNACLE uses information on the interactions among training point types, which had not been considered before, based on an analysis of PINN training dynamics via the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK). We theoretically show that the criterion used by PINNACLE is related to the PINN generalization error, and empirically demonstrate that PINNACLE is able to outperform existing point selection methods for forward, inverse, and transfer learning problems. Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Apivich Hemachandra, See-Kiong Ng, Kian Hsiang Low |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Quantum Bayesian OptimizationabstractKernelized bandits, also known as Bayesian optimization (BO), has been a prevalent method for optimizing complicated black-box reward functions. Various BO algorithms have been theoretically shown to enjoy upper bounds on their cumulative regret which are sub-linear in the number $T$ of iterations, and a regret lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$ has been derived which represents the unavoidable regrets for any classical BO algorithm. Recent works on quantum bandits have shown that with the aid of quantum computing, it is possible to achieve tighter regret upper bounds better than their corresponding classical lower bounds. However, these works are restricted to either multi-armed or linear bandits, and are hence not able to solve sophisticated real-world problems with non-linear reward functions. To this end, we introduce the quantum-Gaussian process-upper confidence bound (Q-GP-UCB) algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, our Q-GP-UCB is the first BO algorithm able to achieve a regret upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(\text{poly}\log T)$, which is significantly smaller than its regret lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$ in the classical setting. Moreover, thanks to our novel analysis of the confidence ellipsoid, our Q-GP-UCB with the linear kernel achieves a smaller regret than the quantum linear UCB algorithm from the previous work. We use simulations, as well as an experiment using a real quantum computer, to verify that the theoretical quantum speedup achieved by our Q-GP-UCB is also potentially relevant in practice. Zhongxiang Dai, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, Arun Verma, Yao Shu, Kian Hsiang Low, Patrick Jaillet |
NeurIPS | 2 |