Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Khaled Abud

dblp:358/9100 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-7131-5839ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Image and video coding · 51% Image and video processing · 33% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 16%
Network and information security
3 papers
Digital forensics and information hiding · 61% Security and privacy of machine learning · 39%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 77% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
1.722025
Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metrics · ICML 2025
IQA-Adapter: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from Image Quality Assessment to Diffusion-based Generative Models · ICCV 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
1.122025
Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metrics · ICML 2025
Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
IQA-Adapter: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from Image Quality Assessment to Diffusion-based Generative Models · ICCV 2025
Image and video processing › information hiding
image watermarking
0.912025
WIBE: Watermarks for generated Images - Benchmarking & Evaluation · ASE 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › robust watermarking
robust image watermarking
0.912025
WIBE: Watermarks for generated Images - Benchmarking & Evaluation · ASE 2025
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
0.912025
WIBE: Watermarks for generated Images - Benchmarking & Evaluation · ASE 2025
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
no-reference quality assessment
0.812024
Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2024
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
video quality assessment
0.812024
Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer
0.312025
IQA-Adapter: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from Image Quality Assessment to Diffusion-based Generative Models · ICCV 2025
Information retrieval › search engines
search engine ranking
0.312025
Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metrics · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial attack · 4.1purification · 2.6certified defense · 2.6adversarial training · 2.6plugin-based architecture · 1.7knowledge transfer · 1.7gradient-based guidance · 1.7benchmarking · 1.7adapter conditioning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 IQA-Adapter: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from Image Quality Assessment to Diffusion-based Generative Models
abstract
Diffusion-based models have recently revolutionized image generation, achieving unprecedented levels of fidelity. However, consistent generation of high-quality images remains challenging partly due to the lack of conditioning mechanisms for perceptual quality. In this work, we propose methods to integrate image quality assessment (IQA) models into diffusion-based generators, enabling quality-aware image generation. We show that diffusion models can learn complex qualitative relationships from both IQA models' outputs and internal activations. First, we experiment with gradient-based guidance to optimize image quality directly and show this method has limited generalizability. To address this, we introduce IQA-Adapter, a novel framework that conditions generation on target quality levels by learning the implicit relationship between images and quality scores. When conditioned on high target quality, IQA-Adapter can shift the distribution of generated images towards a higher-quality subdomain, and, inversely, it can be used as a degradation model, generating progressively more distorted images when provided with a lower-quality signal. Under high-quality condition, IQA-Adapter achieves up to a 10% improvement across multiple objective metrics, as confirmed by a user preference study, while preserving generative diversity and content. Furthermore, we extend IQA-Adapter to a reference-based conditioning scenario, utilizing the rich activation space of IQA models to transfer highly specific, content-agnostic qualitative features between images.
Khaled Abud, Sergey Lavrushkin, Alexey Kirillov, Dmitriy S. Vatolin
ICCV1
2025 Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metrics
abstract
Modern neural-network-based Image Quality Assessment (IQA) metrics are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which can be exploited to manipulate search engine rankings, benchmark results, and content quality assessments, raising concerns about the reliability of IQA metrics in critical applications. This paper presents the first comprehensive study of IQA defense mechanisms in response to adversarial attacks on these metrics to pave the way for safer use of IQA metrics. We systematically evaluated 30 defense strategies, including purification, training-based, and certified methods --- and applied 14 adversarial attacks in adaptive and non-adaptive settings to compare these defenses on 9 no-reference IQA metrics. Our proposed benchmark aims to guide the development of IQA defense methods and is open to submissions; the latest results and code are at https://msu-video-group.github.io/adversarial-defenses-for-iqa/.
Aleksandr Gushchin, Khaled Abud, Georgii Bychkov, Ekaterina Shumitskaya, Anna Chistyakova, Sergey Lavrushkin, Bader Rasheed, Kirill Malyshev, Dmitriy S. Vatolin, Anastasia Antsiferova
ICML2
2025 WIBE: Watermarks for generated Images - Benchmarking & Evaluation
abstract
As invisible image watermarking gains importance for verifying AI-generated content, consistency and reproducibility remain major challenges due to the diverse methods, datasets, attacks, and metrics.We aim to provide a flexible, extensible, and user-friendly framework that enables systematic testing of watermarking methods under various conditions.We developed WIBE, a framework with command-line interfaces and YAML configuration support, enabling users to evaluate a wide range of image watermarking algorithms on various datasets, apply configurable attack scenarios, and compute standard performance metrics. WIBE includes a library of pre-implemented methods and supports integration of new watermarking techniques, attacks, metrics, and datasets through a plugin-based architecture.WIBE enables rapid prototyping, reproducible experiments, and insightful comparison of watermarking robustness. In our demo, we present its core features, plugin extensibility, and interactive infographics, making it a practical tool for researchers and practitioners working at the intersection of AI and media integrity.Project on GitHub: https://github.com/ispras/wibeYouTube video: https://youtu.be/lbWWB1crrwk
Aleksey Yakushev, Aleksandr Akimenkov, Khaled Abud, Dmitry Obydenkov, Irina Serzhenko, Kirill Aistov, Egor Kovalev, Stanislav A. Fomin, Anastasia Antsiferova, Kirill Lukianov, Yury Markin
ASE3
2024 Comparing the Robustness of Modern No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics to Adversarial Attacks
abstract
Nowadays, neural-network-based image- and video-quality metrics perform better than traditional methods. However, they also became more vulnerable to adversarial attacks that increase metrics' scores without improving visual quality. The existing benchmarks of quality metrics compare their performance in terms of correlation with subjective quality and calculation time. Nonetheless, the adversarial robustness of image-quality metrics is also an area worth researching. This paper analyses modern metrics' robustness to different adversarial attacks. We adapted adversarial attacks from computer vision tasks and compared attacks' efficiency against 15 no-reference image- and video-quality metrics. Some metrics showed high resistance to adversarial attacks, which makes their usage in benchmarks safer than vulnerable metrics. The benchmark accepts submissions of new metrics for researchers who want to make their metrics more robust to attacks or to find such metrics for their needs. The latest results can be found online: https://videoprocessing.ai/benchmarks/metrics-robustness.html.
Anastasia Antsiferova, Khaled Abud, Aleksandr Gushchin, Ekaterina Shumitskaya, Sergey Lavrushkin, Dmitriy S. Vatolin
AAAI2