EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Artemis Çapari
dblp:358/9895
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-4747-104XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ScienceDirect Topic Pages: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Concepts Across Various Science Domains · SIGIR 2024 |
Information retrieval › web search
scholarly search |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ScienceDirect Topic Pages: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Concepts Across Various Science Domains · SIGIR 2024 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Extracting, Detecting, and Generating Research Questions for Scientific ArticlesabstractThe volume of academic articles is increasing rapidly, reflecting the growing emphasis on research and scholarship across different science disciplines. This rapid growth necessitates the development of tools for more efficient and rapid understanding of these articles. Clear and well-defined Research Questions (RQs) in research articles can help guide scholarly inquiries. However, many academic studies lack a proper definition of RQs in their articles. This research addresses this gap by presenting a comprehensive framework for the systematic extraction, detection, and generation of RQs from scientific articles. The extraction component uses a set of regular expressions to identify articles containing well-defined RQs. The detection component aims to identify more complex RQs in articles, beyond those captured by the rule-based extraction method. The RQ generation focuses on creating RQs for articles that lack them. We integrate all these components to build a pipeline to extract RQs or generate them based on the articles’ full text. We evaluate the performance of the designed pipeline on a set of metrics designed to assess the quality of RQs. Our results indicate that the proposed pipeline can reliably detect RQs and generate high-quality ones. Sina Taslimi, Artemis Çapari, Hosein Azarbonyad, Zi Long Zhu, Zubair Afzal, Evangelos Kanoulas, George Tsatsaronis 0001 |
COLING | 2 |
| 2024 | ScienceDirect Topic Pages: A Knowledge Base of Scientific Concepts Across Various Science Domains
Artemis Çapari, Hosein Azarbonyad, George Tsatsaronis 0001, Zubair Afzal, Judson Dunham |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2021 | Modelling Human Communication as a Rejection Game
Artemis Çapari, Giorgio Sbardolini |
CogSci | 1 |