Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dror Yashar

dblp:359/0451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4893-6310ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 77% Question answering and dialogue systems · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning
0.812024
Table-GPT: Table Fine-tuned GPT for Diverse Table Tasks · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Data integration and cleaning
table understanding
0.812024
Table-GPT: Table Fine-tuned GPT for Diverse Table Tasks · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering
0.212024
Table-GPT: Table Fine-tuned GPT for Diverse Table Tasks · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

table-task synthesis · 1.5instruction fine-tuning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Table-GPT: Table Fine-tuned GPT for Diverse Table Tasks
abstract
Language models, such as GPT-3 and ChatGPT, demonstrate remarkable abilities to follow diverse human instructions and perform a wide range of tasks, using instruction fine-tuning. However, when we test language models with a range of basic table-understanding tasks, we observe that today's language models are still sub-optimal in many table-related tasks, likely because they are pre-trained predominantly on one-dimensional natural-language texts, whereas relational tables are two-dimensional objects. In this work, we propose a new "\emphtable fine-tuning '' paradigm, where we continue to train/fine-tune language models like GPT-3.5 and ChatGPT, using diverse table-tasks synthesized from real tables as training data, which is analogous to "instruction fine-tuning'', but with the goal of enhancing language models' ability to understand tables and perform table tasks. We show that our resulting \sys models demonstrate: (1) better table-understanding capabilities, by consistently outperforming the vanilla GPT-3.5 and ChatGPT, on a wide range of table tasks (data transformation, data cleaning, data profiling, data imputation, table-QA, etc.), including tasks that are completely holdout and unseen during training, and (2) strong generalizability, in its ability to respond to diverse human instructions to perform new and unseen table-tasks, in a manner similar to GPT-3.5 and ChatGPT. Our code and data have been released at https://github.com/microsoft/Table-GPT for future research.
Peng Li 0062, Yeye He, Dror Yashar, Weiwei Cui 0001, Danielle Rifinski Fainman, Dongmei Zhang 0001, Surajit Chaudhuri
Proc. ACM Manag. Data3