Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yu Mou

dblp:359/1010 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph algorithms
graph decomposition
1.012026
How to Break It Down for Building It Up? Theory-Guided Graph Decomposition Learning for Spatiotemporal Traffic Prediction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning
spatio-temporal graph learning
1.012026
How to Break It Down for Building It Up? Theory-Guided Graph Decomposition Learning for Spatiotemporal Traffic Prediction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › spatio-temporal graph learning
traffic forecasting
1.012026
How to Break It Down for Building It Up? Theory-Guided Graph Decomposition Learning for Spatiotemporal Traffic Prediction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information-theoretic analysis · 2.0graph decomposition · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 How to Break It Down for Building It Up? Theory-Guided Graph Decomposition Learning for Spatiotemporal Traffic Prediction
abstract
Traffic state prediction based on spatiotemporal data has become a prominent focus in data-driven AI research. While significant progress has been made, most mainstream approaches assume uniform spatial and temporal correlations across conditions and use shared parameters for all scenarios. This simplification overlooks the complexity and heterogeneity inherent in human mobility patterns, often leading to suboptimal predictions. Recently, methods adopting the "decompose, then predict" (DTP) paradigm have gained traction. These methods break down data into smaller, manageable subcomponents, each predicted using dedicated parameters. Although effective in practice, DTP methods face unresolved theoretical questions: What type of decomposition truly makes subcomponents more manageable than the original data? To address this, we present an information theory-based analysis that derives sufficient conditions for a decomposition algorithm to reduce data-induced prediction errors. These conditions suggest that an effective algorithm should ensure decomposed components are as independent as possible, a principle we term the Component Independence Principle. Guided by this principle, we introduce the Theory-guided Graph Decomposition Learning (TGDL) framework, which decomposes graph-based multivariate time series data into approximately independent subgraph components that are easier to predict than the original data. Moreover, TGDL is a portable framework that can be integrated into any graph-based traffic prediction model to improve its predictive performance. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. With a solid theoretical foundation, our TGDL enhances the performance of diverse traffic prediction models, yielding an average improvement of 19.37% across experiments.
Jiahao Ji, Jingyuan Wang 0001, Yu Mou, Cheng Long 0001, Junjie Wu 0002
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3