Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Jin Hyeon Kim

dblp:359/1830 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 75% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
correspondence estimation
0.912025
Cross-View Completion Models are Zero-shot Correspondence Estimators · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
cross-view completion
0.912025
Cross-View Completion Models are Zero-shot Correspondence Estimators · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.912025
Cross-View Completion Models are Zero-shot Correspondence Estimators · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › video depth estimation
multi-frame depth estimation
0.912025
Cross-View Completion Models are Zero-shot Correspondence Estimators · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric matching · 0.9cross-attention map · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Cross-View Completion Models are Zero-shot Correspondence Estimators
abstract
In this work, we explore new perspectives on crossview completion learning by drawing an analogy to self-supervised correspondence learning. Through our analysis, we demonstrate that the cross-attention map within crossview completion models captures correspondence more effectively than other correlations derived from encoder or decoder features. We verify the effectiveness of the cross-attention map by evaluating on both zero-shot matching and learning-based geometric matching and multi-frame depth estimation.
Honggyu An, Jin Hyeon Kim, Seonghoon Park 0002, Jaewoo Jung, Jisang Han, Sunghwan Hong, Seungryong Kim
CVPR2