Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yin Hua

dblp:359/3316 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 78% Question answering and dialogue systems · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
hyper-relational knowledge graph
1.012026
UniHR: Hierarchical Representation Learning for Unified Knowledge Graph Link Prediction · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
1.012026
UniHR: Hierarchical Representation Learning for Unified Knowledge Graph Link Prediction · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
temporal knowledge graph
1.012026
UniHR: Hierarchical Representation Learning for Unified Knowledge Graph Link Prediction · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question answering over structured data
0.912025
TrustUQA: A Trustful Framework for Unified Structured Data Question Answering · AAAI 2025
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph querying
knowledge graph question answering
0.912025
TrustUQA: A Trustful Framework for Unified Structured Data Question Answering · AAAI 2025
Information retrieval › query understanding
query parsing
0.312025
TrustUQA: A Trustful Framework for Unified Structured Data Question Answering · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7in-context demonstration retrieval · 1.7message passing · 1.0hierarchical representation learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 UniHR: Hierarchical Representation Learning for Unified Knowledge Graph Link Prediction
abstract
Real-world knowledge graphs (KGs) contain not only standard triple-based facts, but also more complex, heterogeneous types of facts, such as hyper-relational facts with auxiliary key-value pairs, temporal facts with additional timestamps, and nested facts that imply relationships between facts. These richer forms of representation have attracted significant attention due to their enhanced expressiveness and capacity to model complex semantics in real-world scenarios. However, most existing studies suffer from two main limitations: (1) they typically focus on modeling only specific types of facts, thus making it difficult to generalize to real-world scenarios with multiple fact types; and (2) they struggle to achieve generalizable hierarchical (inter-fact and intra-fact) modeling due to the complexity of these representations. To overcome these limitations, we propose UniHR, a Unified Hierarchical Representation learning framework, which consists of a learning-optimized Hierarchical Data Representation (HiDR) module and a unified Hierarchical Structure Learning (HiSL) module. The HiDR module unifies hyper-relational KGs, temporal KGs, and nested factual KGs into triple-based representations. Then HiSL incorporates intra-fact and inter-fact message passing, focusing on enhancing both semantic information within individual facts and enriching the structural information between facts. To go beyond the unified method itself, we further explore the potential of unified representation in complex real-world scenarios. Extensive experiments on 9 datasets across 5 types of KGs demonstrate the effectiveness of UniHR and highlight the strong potential of unified representations.
Yin Hua, Mingyang Chen 0002, Yichi Zhang 0009, Zhuo Chen 0007, Lei Liang 0002, Wen Zhang 0015
AAAI2
2025 TrustUQA: A Trustful Framework for Unified Structured Data Question Answering
abstract
Natural language question answering (QA) over structured data sources such as tables and knowledge graphs have been widely investigated, especially with Large Language Models (LLMs) in recent years. The main solutions include question to formal query parsing and retrieval-based answer generation. However, current methods of the former often suffer from weak generalization, failing to dealing with multi-types of sources, while the later is limited in trustfulness. In this paper, we propose TrustUQA, a trustful QA framework that can simultaneously support multiple types of structured data in a unified way. To this end, it adopts an LLM-friendly and unified knowledge representation method called Condition Graph (CG), and uses an LLM and demonstration-based two-level method for CG querying. For enhancement, it is also equipped with dynamic demonstration retrieval. We have evaluated TrustUQA with 5 benchmarks covering 3 types of structured data. It outperforms 2 existing unified structured data QA methods. In comparison with the baselines that are specific to one data type, it achieves state-of-the-art on 2 of the datasets. Further more, we have demonstrated the potential of our method for more general QA tasks, QA over mixed structured data and QA across structured data.
Wen Zhang 0015, Yushan Zhu, Jiaoyan Chen 0001, Zhiwei Huang 0006, Yin Hua, Lei Liang 0002, Huajun Chen
AAAI7