Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani
dblp:359/3846
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-7510-564XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EVOTOOL: Self-Evolving Tool-Use Policy Optimization in LLM Agents via Blame-Aware Mutation and Diversity-Aware Selection · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EVOTOOL: Self-Evolving Tool-Use Policy Optimization in LLM Agents via Blame-Aware Mutation and Diversity-Aware Selection · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
self-evolution |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EVOTOOL: Self-Evolving Tool-Use Policy Optimization in LLM Agents via Blame-Aware Mutation and Diversity-Aware Selection · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diversity-aware selection · 1.0blame-aware mutation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | EVOTOOL: Self-Evolving Tool-Use Policy Optimization in LLM Agents via Blame-Aware Mutation and Diversity-Aware SelectionabstractShuo Yang, Caren Han, Xueqi Ma, Yan Li, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani, Eduard Hovy. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Soyeon Caren Han, Xueqi Ma, Yan Li 0186, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani, Eduard H. Hovy |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | Are We Done with MMLU?abstractAryo Pradipta Gema, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Giwon Hong, Alessio Devoto, Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino, Rohit Saxena, Xuanli He, Yu Zhao, Xiaotang Du, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani, Claire Barale, Robert McHardy, Joshua Harris, Jean Kaddour, Emile Van Krieken, Pasquale Minervini. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Aryo Pradipta Gema, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Giwon Hong, Alessio Devoto, Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino, Rohit Saxena, Xuanli He, Yu Zhao 0043, Xiaotang Du, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani, Claire Barale, Robert McHardy, Joshua Harris, Jean Kaddour, Emile van Krieken, Pasquale Minervini |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 10 |
| 2023 | REFER: An End-to-end Rationale Extraction Framework for Explanation RegularizationabstractHuman-annotated textual explanations are becoming increasingly important in Explainable Natural Language Processing.Rationale extraction aims to provide faithful (i.e., reflective of the behavior of the model) and plausible (i.e., convincing to humans) explanations by highlighting the inputs that had the largest impact on the prediction without compromising the performance of the task model.In recent works, the focus of training rationale extractors was primarily on optimizing for plausibility using human highlights, while the task model was trained on jointly optimizing for task predictive accuracy and faithfulness.We propose REFER, a framework that employs a differentiable rationale extractor that allows to back-propagate through the rationale extraction process.We analyze the impact of using human highlights during training by jointly training the task model and the rationale extractor.In our experiments, REFER yields significantly better results in terms of faithfulness, plausibility, and downstream task accuracy on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution data.On both e-SNLI and CoS-E, our best setting produces better results in terms of composite normalized relative gain than the previous baselines by 11% and 3%, respectively. Mohammad Reza Ghasemi Madani, Pasquale Minervini |
CoNLL | 1 |