Runheng Liu

dblp:359/4782 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 33% Image recognition and object detection · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI-generated content detection
0.912025
Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › machine-generated text detection
LLM-generated text detection
0.912025
Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-vocabulary object detection
zero-shot object detection
0.912025
Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

implicit reward model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text via Implicit Reward Model
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks. However, their ability to generate human-like text has raised concerns about potential misuse. This underscores the need for reliable and effective methods to detect LLM-generated text. In this paper, we propose IRM, a novel zero-shot approach that leverages Implicit Reward Models for LLM-generated text detection. Such implicit reward models can be derived from publicly available instruction-tuned and base models. Previous reward-based method relies on preference construction and task-specific fine-tuning. In comparison, IRM requires neither preference collection nor additional training. We evaluate IRM on the DetectRL benchmark and demonstrate that IRM can achieve superior detection performance, outperforms existing zero-shot and supervised methods in LLM-generated text detection.
Runheng Liu, Heyan Huang, Xingchen Xiao, Zhijing Wu 0001
NeurIPS1