Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emil Wiman
dblp:359/5610
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 44% Robot navigation and mapping · 44% Motion planning and robot control · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › obstacle avoidance
dynamic obstacle avoidance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Autonomous 3D Exploration in Large-Scale Environments with Dynamic Obstacles · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Autonomous 3D Exploration in Large-Scale Environments with Dynamic Obstacles · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
collision avoidance |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Autonomous 3D Exploration in Large-Scale Environments with Dynamic Obstacles · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dynamic obstacle planning · 0.8AEP · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Safe Lattice Planning for Motion Planning with Dynamic ObstaclesabstractMotion planning in dynamic and uncertain real-world environments remains a critical challenge in robotics, as it is essential for the effective operation of autonomous systems. One strategy for motion planning has been to introduce a state lattice where pre-computed motion primitives can be combined with graph-based search methods to find a physically feasible motion plan. However, introducing lattice planning into dynamic, uncertain settings remains challenging. It is nontrivial to incorporate uncertain dynamic information into the planning process in real time. Thus, in this paper we propose a lattice planning framework for dynamic environments with extensions to handle safety-critical edge-cases that can arise with the uncertain nature of the environment. The proposed method, Safe Lattice Planner (SLP), extends the Receding-Horizon Lattice Planner (RHLP) with enhanced replanning and survival capabilities to handle the dynamic habitat. We thoroughly evaluate SLP in a new benchmark suite against provided baselines. SLP is found to outperform the baselines in terms of safety and resilience in the dynamic environment while reaching the goal state in an efficient manner. We release the benchmark and SLP to accelerate the field of safe robotics. Emil Wiman, Mattias Tiger |
IROS | 1 |
| 2024 | Autonomous 3D Exploration in Large-Scale Environments with Dynamic ObstaclesabstractExploration in dynamic and uncertain real-world environments is an open problem in robotics and it constitutes a foundational capability of autonomous systems operating in most of the real-world. While 3D exploration planning has been extensively studied, the environments are assumed static or only reactive collision avoidance is carried out. We propose a novel approach to not only avoid dynamic obstacles but also include them in the plan itself, to deliberately exploit the dynamic environment in the agent’s favor. The proposed planner, Dynamic Autonomous Exploration Planner (DAEP), extends AEP to explicitly plan with respect to dynamic obstacles. Furthermore, addressing prior errors within AEP in DAEP has resulted in enhanced exploration within static environments. To thoroughly evaluate exploration planners in such settings we propose a new enhanced benchmark suite with several dynamic environments, including large-scale outdoor environments. DAEP outperforms state-of-the-art planners in dynamic and large-scale environments and is shown to be more effective at both exploration and collision avoidance. Emil Wiman, Ludvig Widén, Mattias Tiger, Fredrik Heintz |
ICRA | 1 |