Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rishi D. Jha
dblp:359/6028
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 75% Privacy and data protection · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 83% Vision and language · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Adversarial Hubness in Multi-Modal Retrieval · SP 2026 Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddings · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Information retrieval
multimodal retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Adversarial Hubness in Multi-Modal Retrieval · SP 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › inference attack
embedding inversion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Label Poisoning is All You Need · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information retrieval
hubness |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Adversarial Hubness in Multi-Modal Retrieval · SP 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddings · USENIX Security Symposium 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Label Poisoning is All You Need · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial hub generation · 2.0unsupervised translation · 1.7universal latent representation · 1.7embedding space perturbation · 1.5trajectory matching · 0.7dataset distillation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Adversarial Hubness in Multi-Modal RetrievalabstractHubness is a phenomenon in high-dimensional vector spaces where a point from the natural distribution is unusually close to many other points. This is a well-known problem in information retrieval that causes some items to accidentally (and incorrectly) appear relevant to many queries. In this paper, we investigate how attackers can exploit hubness to turn any image or audio input in a multi-modal retrieval system into an adversarial hub. Adversarial hubs can be used to inject universal adversarial content (e.g., spam) that will be retrieved in response to thousands of different queries, and also for targeted attacks on queries related to specific, attacker-chosen concepts. We present a method for creating adversarial hubs and evaluate the resulting hubs on benchmark multi-modal retrieval datasets and an image-to-image retrieval system implemented by Pinecone, a popular vector database. For example, in text-caption-to-image retrieval, a single adversarial hub, generated using 100 random queries, is retrieved as the top-1 most relevant image for more than 21,000 out of 25,000 test queries (by contrast, the most common natural hub is the top-1 response to only 102 queries), demonstrating the strong generalization capabilities of adversarial hubs. We also investigate whether techniques for mitigating natural hubness can also mitigate adversarial hubs, and show that they are not effective against hubs that target queries related to specific concepts. Fnu Suya, Rishi D. Jha, Collin Zhang, Vitaly Shmatikov |
SP | 3 |
| 2025 | Harnessing the Universal Geometry of EmbeddingsabstractWe introduce the first method for translating text embeddings from one vector space to another without any paired data, encoders, or predefined sets of matches. Our unsupervised approach translates any embedding to and from a universal latent representation (i.e., a universal semantic structure conjectured by the Platonic Representation Hypothesis). Our translations achieve high cosine similarity across model pairs with different architectures, parameter counts, and training datasets.
The ability to translate unknown embeddings into a different space while preserving their geometry has serious implications for the security of vector databases. An adversary with access only to embedding vectors can extract sensitive information about the underlying documents, sufficient for classification and attribute inference. Rishi D. Jha, Collin Zhang, Vitaly Shmatikov, John X. Morris |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Adversarial Illusions in Multi-Modal Embeddings
Rishi D. Jha, Eugene Bagdasarian, Vitaly Shmatikov |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2023 | Label Poisoning is All You NeedabstractIn a backdoor attack, an adversary injects corrupted data into a model's training dataset in order to gain control over its predictions on images with a specific attacker-defined trigger. A typical corrupted training example requires altering both the image, by applying the trigger, and the label. Models trained on clean images, therefore, were considered safe from backdoor attacks. However, in some common machine learning scenarios, the training labels are provided by potentially malicious third-parties. This includes crowd-sourced annotation and knowledge distillation. We, hence, investigate a fundamental question: can we launch a successful backdoor attack by only corrupting labels? We introduce a novel approach to design label-only backdoor attacks, which we call FLIP, and demonstrate its strengths on three datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet) and four architectures (ResNet-32, ResNet-18, VGG-19, and Vision Transformer). With only 2% of CIFAR-10 labels corrupted, FLIP achieves a near-perfect attack success rate of 99.4% while suffering only a 1.8% drop in the clean test accuracy. Our approach builds upon the recent advances in trajectory matching, originally introduced for dataset distillation. Rishi D. Jha, Jonathan Hayase, Sewoong Oh |
NeurIPS | 1 |