Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

You-Ming Chang

dblp:359/6124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Vision and language · 44% Efficient and distributed learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › content moderation
harmful content detection
0.812024
T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.812024
T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data curation
0.212024
T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 0.8multi-agent debate · 0.8in-context learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition
abstract
While widespread access to the Internet and the rapid advancement of generative models boost people's creativity and productivity, the risk of encountering inappropriate or harmful content also increases. To address the aforementioned issue, researchers managed to incorporate several harmful contents datasets with machine learning methods to detect harmful concepts. However, existing harmful datasets are curated by the presence of a narrow range of harmful objects, and only cover real harmful content sources. This restricts the generalizability of methods based on such datasets and leads to the potential misjudgment in certain cases. Therefore, we propose a comprehensive and extensive harmful dataset, VHD11K, consisting of 10,000 images and 1,000 videos, crawled from the Internet and generated by 4 generative models, across a total of 10 harmful categories covering a full spectrum of harmful concepts with non-trival definition. We also propose a novel annotation framework by formulating the annotation process as a multi-agent Visual Question Answering (VQA) task, having 3 different VLMs "debate" about whether the given image/video is harmful, and incorporating the in-context learning strategy in the debating process. Therefore, we can ensure that the VLMs consider the context of the given image/video and both sides of the arguments thoroughly before making decisions, further reducing the likelihood of misjudgments in edge cases. Evaluation and experimental results demonstrate that (1) the great alignment between the annotation from our novel annotation framework and those from human, ensuring the reliability of VHD11K;(2) our full-spectrum harmful dataset successfully identifies the inability of existing harmful content detection methods to detect extensive harmful contents and improves the performance of existing harmfulness recognition methods;(3) our dataset outperforms the baseline dataset, SMID, as evidenced by the superior improvement in harmfulness recognition methods.The entire dataset is publicly available: https://huggingface.co/datasets/denny3388/VHD11K
Chen Yeh, You-Ming Chang, Walon Wei-Chen Chiu
NeurIPS2