Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
You-Ming Chang
dblp:359/6124
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Vision and language · 44% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › content moderation
harmful content detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data curation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness Recognition · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.8multi-agent debate · 0.8in-context learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | T2Vs Meet VLMs: A Scalable Multimodal Dataset for Visual Harmfulness RecognitionabstractWhile widespread access to the Internet and the rapid advancement of generative models boost people's creativity and productivity, the risk of encountering inappropriate or harmful content also increases. To address the aforementioned issue, researchers managed to incorporate several harmful contents datasets with machine learning methods to detect harmful concepts. However, existing harmful datasets are curated by the presence of a narrow range of harmful objects, and only cover real harmful content sources. This restricts the generalizability of methods based on such datasets and leads to the potential misjudgment in certain cases. Therefore, we propose a comprehensive and extensive harmful dataset, VHD11K, consisting of 10,000 images and 1,000 videos, crawled from the Internet and generated by 4 generative models, across a total of 10 harmful categories covering a full spectrum of harmful concepts with non-trival definition. We also propose a novel annotation framework by formulating the annotation process as a multi-agent Visual Question Answering (VQA) task, having 3 different VLMs "debate" about whether the given image/video is harmful, and incorporating the in-context learning strategy in the debating process. Therefore, we can ensure that the VLMs consider the context of the given image/video and both sides of the arguments thoroughly before making decisions, further reducing the likelihood of misjudgments in edge cases. Evaluation and experimental results demonstrate that (1) the great alignment between the annotation from our novel annotation framework and those from human, ensuring the reliability of VHD11K;(2) our full-spectrum harmful dataset successfully identifies the inability of existing harmful content detection methods to detect extensive harmful contents and improves the performance of existing harmfulness recognition methods;(3) our dataset outperforms the baseline dataset, SMID, as evidenced by the superior improvement in harmfulness recognition methods.The entire dataset is publicly available: https://huggingface.co/datasets/denny3388/VHD11K Chen Yeh, You-Ming Chang, Walon Wei-Chen Chiu |
NeurIPS | 2 |