Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingzhe Shi

dblp:359/6451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-3372-2949ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 27% Generative modeling · 27% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 77% Visualization and visual analytics · 23%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d generation
3d scene generation
0.912025
Graph Canvas for Controllable 3D Scene Generation · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
controllable scene generation
0.912025
Graph Canvas for Controllable 3D Scene Generation · ACM Multimedia 2025
Rendering
scene graph
0.912025
Graph Canvas for Controllable 3D Scene Generation · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
model scaling
0.812024
Scaling Law for Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.812024
Scaling Law for Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2024
Visualization and visual analytics
spatial ability
0.312025
Graph Canvas for Controllable 3D Scene Generation · ACM Multimedia 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

training-free generation · 1.7graph representation · 1.7empirical evaluation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Graph Canvas for Controllable 3D Scene Generation
abstract
Spatial intelligence is fundamental to AI systems that interact with the physical world, particularly in 3D scene generation and spatial comprehension. Current layout generation in 3D scene synthesis remains highly complex, often constrained by predefined datasets and limited dynamic adaptation to changing spatial relationships. In this paper, we propose GraphCanvas3D, a flexible, query-driven framework for controllable 3D scene generation. Unlike traditional methods that require retraining and predefined input masks for modifications, GraphCanvas3D provides a training-free solution supporting the generation of diverse scenes-both indoor and outdoor-through free manipulation of objects and scene elements. Our framework employs hierarchical, graph-driven scene descriptions, representing spatial elements as graph nodes and establishing coherent relationships among objects in 3D environments. The decoupled object representation enables flexible, on-the-fly scene adjustments and dynamic, customizable scene creation. Experimental results and user studies demonstrate that GraphCanvas3D improves usability, adaptability, and generalization across various 3D scene generation tasks, offering a powerful tool for scalable and diverse scene synthesis.
Sen Jia 0003, Jingzhe Shi, Can Jin, Zongkai Wu, Jenq-Neng Hwang, Lei Li 0050
ACM Multimedia4
2024 Scaling Law for Time Series Forecasting
abstract
Scaling law that rewards large datasets, complex models and enhanced data granularity has been observed in various fields of deep learning. Yet, studies on time series forecasting have cast doubt on scaling behaviors of deep learning methods for time series forecasting: while more training data improves performance, more capable models do not always outperform less capable models, and longer input horizon may hurt performance for some models. We propose a theory for scaling law for time series forecasting that can explain these seemingly abnormal behaviors. We take into account the impact of dataset size and model complexity, as well as time series data granularity, particularly focusing on the look-back horizon, an aspect that has been unexplored in previous theories. Furthermore, we empirically evaluate various models using a diverse set of time series forecasting datasets, which (1) verifies the validity of scaling law on dataset size and model complexity within the realm of time series forecasting, and (2) validates our theoretical framework, particularly regarding the influence of look back horizon. We hope our findings may inspire new models targeting time series forecasting datasets of limited size, as well as large foundational datasets and models for time series forecasting in future works.
Jingzhe Shi, Qinwei Ma
NeurIPS1