Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre Marthe

dblp:359/6805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 75% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
distributional reinforcement learning
0.712023
Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.712023
Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.712023
Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
risk-aware planning
0.712023
Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

error bound analysis · 0.7dynamic programming · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes
abstract
What are the functionals of the reward that can be computed and optimized exactly in Markov Decision Processes? In the finite-horizon, undiscounted setting, Dynamic Programming (DP) can only handle these operations efficiently for certain classes of statistics. We summarize the characterization of these classes for policy evaluation, and give a new answer for the planning problem. Interestingly, we prove that only generalized means can be optimized exactly, even in the more general framework of Distributional Reinforcement Learning (DistRL). DistRL permits, however, to evaluate other functionals approximately. We provide error bounds on the resulting estimators, and discuss the potential of this approach as well as its limitations. These results contribute to advancing the theory of Markov Decision Processes by examining overall characteristics of the return, and particularly risk-conscious strategies.
Alexandre Marthe, Aurélien Garivier, Claire Vernade
NeurIPS1