Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandre Marthe
dblp:359/6805
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 75% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
distributional reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
risk-aware planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
error bound analysis · 0.7dynamic programming · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Beyond Average Return in Markov Decision ProcessesabstractWhat are the functionals of the reward that can be computed and optimized exactly in Markov Decision Processes?
In the finite-horizon, undiscounted setting, Dynamic Programming (DP) can only handle these operations efficiently for certain classes of statistics. We summarize the characterization of these classes for policy evaluation, and give a new answer for the planning problem. Interestingly, we prove that only generalized means can be optimized exactly, even in the more general framework of Distributional Reinforcement Learning (DistRL).
DistRL permits, however, to evaluate other functionals approximately. We provide error bounds on the resulting estimators, and discuss the potential of this approach as well as its limitations.
These results contribute to advancing the theory of Markov Decision Processes by examining overall characteristics of the return, and particularly risk-conscious strategies. Alexandre Marthe, Aurélien Garivier, Claire Vernade |
NeurIPS | 1 |