Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daisuke Urano
dblp:359/9049
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 79% Reinforcement learning · 11% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
2.7 | 4 | 2024 | A Unified Framework for Bayesian Optimization under Contextual Uncertainty · ICLR 2024 Bayesian Optimization with Cost-varying Variable Subsets · NeurIPS 2023 Batch Bayesian Optimization For Replicable Experimental Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
contextual bayesian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Unified Framework for Bayesian Optimization under Contextual Uncertainty · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Unified Framework for Bayesian Optimization under Contextual Uncertainty · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
robust optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Unified Framework for Bayesian Optimization under Contextual Uncertainty · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
batch bayesian optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Batch Bayesian Optimization For Replicable Experimental Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Batch Bayesian Optimization For Replicable Experimental Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bayesian Optimization with Cost-varying Variable Subsets · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
risk-sensitive optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Efficient Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimization with Worst-case Sensitivity · ICML 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › decision theory
decision making under uncertainty |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Unified Framework for Bayesian Optimization under Contextual Uncertainty · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Batch Bayesian Optimization For Replicable Experimental Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 1.5risk measures · 1.5risk-averse optimization · 0.7gaussian process upper confidence bound · 0.7adaptive replication · 0.7worst-case sensitivity approximation · 0.6regret analysis · 0.6convex optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Unified Framework for Bayesian Optimization under Contextual UncertaintyabstractBayesian optimization under contextual uncertainty (BOCU) is a family of BO problems in which the learner makes a decision prior to observing the context and must manage the risks involved. Distributionally robust BO (DRBO) is a subset of BOCU that affords robustness against context distribution shift, and includes the optimization of expected values and worst-case values as special cases. By considering the first derivatives of the DRBO objective, we generalize DRBO to one that includes several other uncertainty objectives studied in the BOCU literature such as worst-case sensitivity (and thus notions of risk such as variance, range, and conditional value-at-risk) and mean-risk tradeoffs. We develop a general Thompson sampling algorithm that is able to optimize any objective within the BOCU framework, analyze its theoretical properties, and compare it to suitable baselines across different experimental settings and uncertainty objectives. Sebastian Tay, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Daisuke Urano, Richalynn Leong, Kian Hsiang Low |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Batch Bayesian Optimization For Replicable Experimental DesignabstractMany real-world experimental design problems (a) evaluate multiple experimental conditions in parallel and (b) replicate each condition multiple times due to large and heteroscedastic observation noise. Given a fixed total budget, this naturally induces a trade-off between evaluating more unique conditions while replicating each of them fewer times vs. evaluating fewer unique conditions and replicating each more times. Moreover, in these problems, practitioners may be risk-averse and hence prefer an input with both good average performance and small variability. To tackle both challenges, we propose the Batch Thompson Sampling for Replicable Experimental Design (BTS-RED) framework, which encompasses three algorithms. Our BTS-RED-Known and BTS-RED-Unknown algorithms, for, respectively, known and unknown noise variance, choose the number of replications adaptively rather than deterministically such that an input with a larger noise variance is replicated more times. As a result, despite the noise heteroscedasticity, both algorithms enjoy a theoretical guarantee and are asymptotically no-regret. Our Mean-Var-BTS-RED algorithm aims at risk-averse optimization and is also asymptotically no-regret. We also show the effectiveness of our algorithms in two practical real-world applications: precision agriculture and AutoML. Zhongxiang Dai, Quoc Phong Nguyen, Sebastian Tay, Daisuke Urano, Richalynn Leong, Kian Hsiang Low, Patrick Jaillet |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | Bayesian Optimization with Cost-varying Variable SubsetsabstractWe introduce the problem of Bayesian optimization with cost-varying variable subsets (BOCVS) where in each iteration, the learner chooses a subset of query variables and specifies their values while the rest are randomly sampled. Each chosen subset has an associated cost. This presents the learner with the novel challenge of balancing between choosing more informative subsets for more directed learning versus leaving some variables to be randomly sampled to reduce incurred costs. This paper presents a novel Gaussian process upper confidence bound-based algorithm for solving the BOCVS problem that is provably no-regret. We analyze how the availability of cheaper control sets helps in exploration and reduces overall regret. We empirically show that our proposed algorithm can find significantly better solutions than comparable baselines with the same budget. Sebastian Tay, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Daisuke Urano, Richalynn Leong, Kian Hsiang Low |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Efficient Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimization with Worst-case SensitivityabstractIn distributionally robust Bayesian optimization (DRBO), an exact computation of the worst-case expected value requires solving an expensive convex optimization problem. We develop a fast approximation of the worst-case expected value based on the notion of worst-case sensitivity that caters to arbitrary convex distribution distances. We provide a regret bound for our novel DRBO algorithm with the fast approximation, and empirically show it is competitive with that using the exact worst-case expected value while incurring significantly less computation time. In order to guide the choice of distribution distance to be used with DRBO, we show that our approximation implicitly optimizes an objective close to an interpretable risk-sensitive value. Sebastian Tay, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Daisuke Urano, Richalynn Leong, Kian Hsiang Low |
ICML | 3 |