Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Claudius T. Tewari

dblp:359/9236 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 78% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 18% Robot navigation and mapping · 4%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory planning
decentralized trajectory planning
1.622025
PRIMER: Perception-Aware Robust Learning-Based Multiagent Trajectory Planner · ICRA 2025
PUMA: Fully Decentralized Uncertainty-aware Multiagent Trajectory Planner with Real-time Image Segmentation-based Frame Alignment · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
multi-robot motion planning
1.622025
PRIMER: Perception-Aware Robust Learning-Based Multiagent Trajectory Planner · ICRA 2025
PUMA: Fully Decentralized Uncertainty-aware Multiagent Trajectory Planner with Real-time Image Segmentation-based Frame Alignment · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
perception-aware planning
0.912025
PRIMER: Perception-Aware Robust Learning-Based Multiagent Trajectory Planner · ICRA 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
planning under uncertainty
0.812024
PUMA: Fully Decentralized Uncertainty-aware Multiagent Trajectory Planner with Real-time Image Segmentation-based Frame Alignment · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › learning for planning
imitation-based planning
0.312025
PRIMER: Perception-Aware Robust Learning-Based Multiagent Trajectory Planner · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.312025
PRIMER: Perception-Aware Robust Learning-Based Multiagent Trajectory Planner · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization
0.212024
PUMA: Fully Decentralized Uncertainty-aware Multiagent Trajectory Planner with Real-time Image Segmentation-based Frame Alignment · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 0.9neural network · 0.9imitation learning · 0.9image segmentation · 0.8geometric consistency · 0.8data association · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PRIMER: Perception-Aware Robust Learning-Based Multiagent Trajectory Planner
abstract
In decentralized multiagent trajectory planners, agents need to communicate and exchange their positions to generate collision-free trajectories. However, due to localization errors/uncertainties, trajectory deconfliction can fail even if trajectories are perfectly shared between agents. To address this issue, we first present PARM and PARM*, perception-aware, decentralized, asynchronous multiagent trajectory planners that enable a team of agents to navigate uncertain environments while deconflicting trajectories and avoiding obstacles using perception information. PARM* differs from PARM as it is less conservative, using more computation to find closer-to-optimal solutions. While these methods achieve state-of-the-art performance, they suffer from high computational costs as they need to solve large optimization problems onboard, making it difficult for agents to replan at high rates. To overcome this challenge, we present our second key contribution, PRIMER, a learning-based planner trained with imitation learning (IL) using PARM* as the expert demonstrator. PRIMER leverages the low computational requirements at deployment of neural networks and achieves a computation speed up to 5614 times faster than optimization-based approaches.
Kota Kondo, Claudius T. Tewari, Andrea Tagliabue, Jesus Tordesillas, Parker C. Lusk, Mason B. Peterson, Jonathan P. How
ICRA2
2024 PUMA: Fully Decentralized Uncertainty-aware Multiagent Trajectory Planner with Real-time Image Segmentation-based Frame Alignment
abstract
Fully decentralized, multiagent trajectory planners enable complex tasks like search and rescue or package delivery by ensuring safe navigation in unknown environments. However, deconflicting trajectories with other agents and ensuring collision-free paths in a fully decentralized setting is complicated by dynamic elements and localization uncertainty. To this end, this paper presents (1) an uncertainty-aware multiagent trajectory planner and (2) an image segmentation-based frame alignment pipeline. The uncertainty-aware planner propagates uncertainty associated with the future motion of detected obstacles, and by incorporating this propagated uncertainty into optimization constraints, the planner effectively navigates around obstacles. Unlike conventional methods that emphasize explicit obstacle tracking, our approach integrates implicit tracking. Moreover, sharing trajectories between agents can cause potential collisions due to frame misalignment. Addressing this, we introduce a novel frame alignment pipeline that rectifies inter-agent frame misalignment. This method leverages a zero-shot image segmentation model for detecting objects in the environment and a data association framework based on geometric consistency for map alignment. Our approach accurately aligns frames with only 0.18 m and 2.7° of mean frame alignment error in our most challenging simulation scenario. In addition, we conducted hardware experiments and successfully achieved 0.29 m and 2.59° of frame alignment error. Together with the alignment framework, our planner ensures safe navigation in unknown environments and collision avoidance in decentralized settings.
Kota Kondo, Claudius T. Tewari, Mason B. Peterson, Annika Thomas, Jouko Kinnari, Andrea Tagliabue, Jonathan P. How
ICRA2