Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Joël M. Malard

dblp:36/10 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 6 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 46% Parallel and multicore computing · 38% High-performance computing · 10%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
distributed data structures
0.012002
Distributed dynamic hash tables using IBM LAPI · SC 2002
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
distributed hash table
0.012002
Distributed dynamic hash tables using IBM LAPI · SC 2002
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes
0.012002
Distributed dynamic hash tables using IBM LAPI · SC 2002
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.012002
Distributed dynamic hash tables using IBM LAPI · SC 2002
High-performance computing
collective communication
0.011991
Threshold pivoting for dense LU factorization on distributed memory multiprocessors · SC 1991
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.011991
Threshold pivoting for dense LU factorization on distributed memory multiprocessors · SC 1991
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
message passing
0.011991
Threshold pivoting for dense LU factorization on distributed memory multiprocessors · SC 1991
High-performance computing
numerical linear algebra
0.011991
Threshold pivoting for dense LU factorization on distributed memory multiprocessors · SC 1991
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and scheduling
0.011991
Threshold pivoting for dense LU factorization on distributed memory multiprocessors · SC 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

one-sided communication · 0.0blocking factor · 0.0threshold pivoting · 0.0multicasting · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A role for Pareto optimality in mining performance data
abstract
Improvements in performance modeling and identification of computational regimes within software libraries is a critical first step in developing software libraries that are truly agile with respect to the application as well as to the hardware. It is shown here that Pareto ranking, a concept from multi-objective optimization, can be an effective tool for mining large performance datasets. The approach is illustrated using software performance data gathered using both the public domain LAPACK library and an asynchronous communication library based on IBM LAPI active message library. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Joël M. Malard
Concurr. Pract. Exp.1
2005 Peptide identification via constrained multi-objective optimization: Pareto-based genetic algorithms
abstract
Abstract Automatic peptide identification from collision‐induced dissociation tandem mass spectrometry data using optimization techniques is made difficult by large plateaus in the fitness landscapes of scoring functions, by the fuzzy nature of constraints from noisy data and by the existence of diverse but equally justifiable probabilistic models of peak matching. Here, two different scoring functions are combined into a parallel multi‐objective optimization framework. It is shown how multi‐objective optimization can be used to empirically test for independence between distinct scoring functions. The loss of selection pressure during the evolution of a population of putative peptide sequences by a Pareto‐driven genetic algorithm is addressed by alternating between two definitions of fitness according to a numerical threshold. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Joël M. Malard, Alejandro Heredia-Langner, William R. Cannon, Ryan W. Mooney, Douglas J. Baxter
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.1
2004 Constrained De Novo Peptide Identification via Multi-Objective Optimization
abstract
Summary form only given. Automatic de novo peptide identification from collision-induced dissociation tandem mass spectrometry data is made difficult by large plateaus in the fitness landscapes of scoring functions and the fuzzy nature of the constraints that is due to noise in the data. A framework is presented for combining different peptide identification methods within a parallel genetic algorithm. The distinctive feature of our approach, based on Pareto ranking, is that it can accommodate constraints and possibly conflicting scoring functions. We have also shown how population structure can significantly improve the wall clock time of a parallel peptide identification genetic algorithm while at the same time maintaining some exchange of information across local populations.
Joël M. Malard, Alejandro Heredia-Langner, Douglas J. Baxter, Kristin H. Jarman, William R. Cannon
IPDPS1
2002 Distributed dynamic hash tables using IBM LAPI
abstract
An asynchronous communication library for accessing and managing dynamic hash tables over a network of Symmetric Multiprocessors (SMP) is presented. A blocking factor is shown experimentally to reduce the variance of the wall clock time. It is also shown that remote accesses to a distributed hash table can be as effective and scalable as the one-sided operations of the low-level communication middleware on an IBM SP.
Joël M. Malard, Robert D. Stewart
SC1
2002 Parallel restricted maximum likelihood estimation for linear models with a dense exogenous matrix
Joël M. Malard
Parallel Comput.1
1991 Threshold pivoting for dense LU factorization on distributed memory multiprocessors
abstract
The cost of pivoting in L U factorization has be­ come non-negligible on MIMD computers due to the acceleration of floating point ari thmetic and compar­ atively slow communications. This study addresses the L U factorization of matrices stored by row. The importance of effici ently broadcasting pivot data is stressed. Multicasting is found preferable in this re­ spect to broadcasting along minimum spanning trees. Threshold pivoting is shown to effectively reduce the number of messages while preserving a good load bal­ ance.
Joël M. Malard
SC1