Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Kerfriden

dblp:36/10262 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-7749-3996ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 77% Computational fabrication · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › finite element analysis
isogeometric analysis
0.212014
Isogeometric analysis suitable trivariate NURBS representation of composite panels with a new offset algorithm · Comput. Aided Des. 2014
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › parametric modeling › spline surfaces
NURBS
0.212014
Isogeometric analysis suitable trivariate NURBS representation of composite panels with a new offset algorithm · Comput. Aided Des. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

offset algorithm · 0.4isogeometric analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Machine Learning-enabled feedback loops for metal powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
abstract
Metal Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) has been attracting an increasing attention as an emerging metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology. Despite its distinctive advantages compared to traditional subtractive manufacturing such as high design flexibility, short development time, low tooling cost, and low production waste, the inconsistent part quality caused by inappropriate product design, non-optimal process plan and inadequate process control has significantly hindered its wide acceptance in the industry. To improve the part quality control in metal PBF process, this paper proposes a novel Machine Learning (ML)-enabled approach for developing feedback loops throughout the entire metal PBF process. A categorisation of metal PBF feedback loops is proposed along with a summary of the critical PBF manufacturing data in each process stage. A generic framework of ML-enabled metal PBF feedback loops is proposed with detailed explanations and examples. The opportunities and challenges of the proposed approach are also discussed. The applications of ML techniques in metal PBF process allow efficient and effective decision-makings to be achieved in each PBF process stage, and hence have a great potential in reducing the number of experiments needed, thus saving a significant amount of time and cost in metal PBF production.
Chao Liu 0031, Léopold Le Roux, Ze Ji, Pierre Kerfriden, Franck Lacan, Samuel Bigot
KES4
2014 Isogeometric analysis suitable trivariate NURBS representation of composite panels with a new offset algorithm
Vinh Phu Nguyen, Pierre Kerfriden, Stéphane P. A. Bordas, Timon Rabczuk
Comput. Aided Des.2
2014 Real-time simulation of contact and cutting of heterogeneous soft-tissues
Hadrien Courtecuisse, Jérémie Allard, Pierre Kerfriden, Stéphane P. A. Bordas, Stephane Cotin, Christian Duriez
Medical Image Anal.3