Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rolf A. Prade

dblp:36/1422 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Computational science and engineering · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › statistical computing
bootstrap resampling
0.011994
ODS_BOOTSTRAP: assessing the statistical reliability of physical maps by bootstrap resampling · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › physical mapping
clone ordering
0.011994
ODS_BOOTSTRAP: assessing the statistical reliability of physical maps by bootstrap resampling · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
physical mapping
0.011994
ODS_BOOTSTRAP: assessing the statistical reliability of physical maps by bootstrap resampling · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bootstrap resampling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 ODS_BOOTSTRAP: assessing the statistical reliability of physical maps by bootstrap resampling
abstract
In the program ODS_BOOTSTRAP we provide a methodology for quickly ordering clones in a genomic library into a physical map and for applying a statistical tool known as the bootstrap to assess the statistical reliability of a clonal ordering. Each clone is assigned a binary fingerprint by one of a variety of experimental approaches to physical mapping. For example, the binary fingerprints might be generated by hybridizing a panel of m probes to a library of n clones. The resulting n x m binary data matrix, X, is input to ODS_BOOTSTRAP, which utilizes the similarity in binary fingerprints of clones to construct a physical map. Under this particular implementation of bootstrap resampling, the m probes (or columns of the data matrix) are sampled randomly with replacement in the computer to generate a new n x m data matrix, X*, from which a second physical map is constructed. The resampling process is repeated 100 or more times to generate 100 or more X* matrices. The resulting 100 or more physical maps are compared with the original physical map based on the original data matrix X by counting how often links in the original physical map reappear. Three confidence statistics are introduced for each link in a physical map. The statistic C1 is defined as the percentage of time two neighboring clones on the original map reappear as neighbors under resampling. The statistic C2 is defined as the percentage of time that two neighboring clones i and j on the original map reappear as neighbors or that a clone with an identical binary fingerprint to clone i reappears as a neighbor to clone j. The statistic C3 is defined as the percentage of time that two neighboring clones on the original map reappear in the same contig under resampling.
Rolf A. Prade, James Griffith, William E. Timberlake, Jonathan P. Arnold
Comput. Appl. Biosci.2