Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Changyu Hu II

dblp:36/1651 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design
0.012004
Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
scoring function development
0.012004
Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein folding
0.012004
Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear scoring · 0.0gaussian kernel functions · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design
abstract
UNLABELLED: Motivation. Protein design aims to identify sequences compatible with a given protein fold but incompatible to any alternative folds. To select the correct sequences and to guide the search process, a design scoring function is critically important. Such a scoring function should be able to characterize the global fitness landscape of many proteins simultaneously. RESULTS: To find optimal design scoring functions, we introduce two geometric views and propose a formulation using a mixture of non-linear Gaussian kernel functions. We aim to solve a simplified protein sequence design problem. Our goal is to distinguish each native sequence for a major portion of representative protein structures from a large number of alternative decoy sequences, each a fragment from proteins of different folds. Our scoring function discriminates perfectly a set of 440 native proteins from 14 million sequence decoys. We show that no linear scoring function can succeed in this task. In a blind test of unrelated proteins, our scoring function misclassfies only 13 native proteins out of 194. This compares favorably with about three-four times more misclassifications when optimal linear functions reported in the literature are used. We also discuss how to develop protein folding scoring function.
Changyu Hu II, Jie Liang 0002
Bioinform.1