Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Changyu Hu II
dblp:36/1651
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
scoring function development |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein folding |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein design · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonlinear scoring · 0.0gaussian kernel functions · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Developing optimal non-linear scoring function for protein designabstractUNLABELLED: Motivation. Protein design aims to identify sequences compatible with a given protein fold but incompatible to any alternative folds. To select the correct sequences and to guide the search process, a design scoring function is critically important. Such a scoring function should be able to characterize the global fitness landscape of many proteins simultaneously. RESULTS: To find optimal design scoring functions, we introduce two geometric views and propose a formulation using a mixture of non-linear Gaussian kernel functions. We aim to solve a simplified protein sequence design problem. Our goal is to distinguish each native sequence for a major portion of representative protein structures from a large number of alternative decoy sequences, each a fragment from proteins of different folds. Our scoring function discriminates perfectly a set of 440 native proteins from 14 million sequence decoys. We show that no linear scoring function can succeed in this task. In a blind test of unrelated proteins, our scoring function misclassfies only 13 native proteins out of 194. This compares favorably with about three-four times more misclassifications when optimal linear functions reported in the literature are used. We also discuss how to develop protein folding scoring function. Changyu Hu II, Jie Liang 0002 |
Bioinform. | 1 |