Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dirk Ormoneit

dblp:36/2143 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 9 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Reinforcement learning · 37% Video understanding and tracking · 17% Multi-agent systems · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.012001
Learning an Agent's Utility Function by Observing Behavior · ICML 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent learning
utility learning
0.012001
Learning an Agent's Utility Function by Observing Behavior · ICML 2001
Data mining
clustering
0.012001
Probabilistic Abstraction Hierarchies · NIPS 2001
Data mining › clustering
hierarchical clustering
0.012001
Probabilistic Abstraction Hierarchies · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
average-reward reinforcement learning
0.012000
Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learning in Average-Cost Problems: An Application to Optimal Portfolio Choice · NIPS 2000
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
human motion tracking
0.012000
Learning and Tracking Cyclic Human Motion · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
kernel-based reinforcement learning
0.012000
Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learning in Average-Cost Problems: An Application to Optimal Portfolio Choice · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Learning theory
nonparametric regression
0.011999
Optimal Kernel Shapes for Local Linear Regression · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection › model averaging
bayesian model averaging
0.011995
Improved Gaussian Mixture Density Estimates Using Bayesian Penalty Terms and Network Averaging · NIPS 1995
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.011995
Improved Gaussian Mixture Density Estimates Using Bayesian Penalty Terms and Network Averaging · NIPS 1995
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic generative model
0.012001
Probabilistic Abstraction Hierarchies · NIPS 2001
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking › probabilistic tracking
bayesian tracking
0.012000
Learning and Tracking Cyclic Human Motion · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.012000
Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learning in Average-Cost Problems: An Application to Optimal Portfolio Choice · NIPS 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood · 0.1global optimization · 0.1temporal difference learning · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1statistical motion model · 0.0principal component analysis · 0.0kernel smoothing · 0.0asymptotic analysis · 0.0ensemble averaging · 0.0bayesian penalty terms · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Representing cyclic human motion using functional analysis
Dirk Ormoneit, Michael J. Black, Trevor J. Hastie, Hedvig Kjellström
Image Vis. Comput.1
2002 Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learning
Dirk Ormoneit, Saunak Sen
Mach. Learn.1
2001 Learning an Agent's Utility Function by Observing Behavior
Urszula Chajewska, Daphne Koller, Dirk Ormoneit
ICML3
2001 Probabilistic Abstraction Hierarchies
abstract
Many domains are naturally organized in an abstraction hierarchy or taxonomy, where the instances in “nearby” classes in the taxonomy are similar. In this pa- per, we provide a general probabilistic framework for clustering data into a set of classes organized as a taxonomy, where each class is associated with a prob- abilistic model from which the data was generated. The clustering algorithm simultaneously optimizes three things: the assignment of data instances to clus- ters, the models associated with the clusters, and the structure of the abstraction hierarchy. A unique feature of our approach is that it utilizes global optimization algorithms for both of the last two steps, reducing the sensitivity to noise and the propensity to local maxima that are characteristic of algorithms such as hierarchi- cal agglomerative clustering that only take local steps. We provide a theoretical analysis for our algorithm, showing that it converges to a local maximum of the joint likelihood of model and data. We present experimental results on synthetic data, and on real data in the domains of gene expression and text.
Eran Segal, Daphne Koller, Dirk Ormoneit
NIPS3
2001 Robust Combination of Local Controllers
Carlos Guestrin, Dirk Ormoneit
UAI2
2001 Lattice Particle Filters
Dirk Ormoneit, Christiane Lemieux, David J. Fleet
UAI1
2000 Kernel-Based Reinforcement Learning in Average-Cost Problems: An Application to Optimal Portfolio Choice
abstract
Many approaches to reinforcement learning combine neural net(cid:173) works or other parametric function approximators with a form of temporal-difference learning to estimate the value function of a Markov Decision Process. A significant disadvantage of those pro(cid:173) cedures is that the resulting learning algorithms are frequently un(cid:173) stable. In this work, we present a new, kernel-based approach to reinforcement learning which overcomes this difficulty and provably converges to a unique solution. By contrast to existing algorithms, our method can also be shown to be consistent in the sense that its costs converge to the optimal costs asymptotically. Our focus is on learning in an average-cost framework and on a practical ap(cid:173) plication to the optimal portfolio choice problem.
Dirk Ormoneit, Peter W. Glynn
NIPS1
2000 Learning and Tracking Cyclic Human Motion
abstract
We present methods for learning and tracking human motion in video. We estimate a statistical model of typical activities from a large set of 3D periodic human motion data by segmenting these data automatically into "cycles". Then the mean and the princi(cid:173) pal components of the cycles are computed using a new algorithm that accounts for missing information and enforces smooth tran(cid:173) sitions between cycles. The learned temporal model provides a prior probability distribution over human motions that can be used in a Bayesian framework for tracking human subjects in complex monocular video sequences and recovering their 3D motion.
Dirk Ormoneit, Hedvig Kjellström, Michael J. Black, Trevor J. Hastie
NIPS1
1999 Optimal Kernel Shapes for Local Linear Regression
Dirk Ormoneit, Trevor J. Hastie
NIPS1
1999 A regularization approach to continuous learning with an application to financial derivatives pricing
abstract
We consider the training of neural networks in cases where the nonlinear relationship of interest gradually changes over time. One possibility to deal with this problem is by regularization where a variation penalty is added to the usual mean squared error criterion. To learn the regularized network weights we suggest the Iterative Extended Kalman Filter (IEKF) as a learning rule, which may be derived from a Bayesian perspective on the regularization problem. A primary application of our algorithm is in financial derivatives pricing, where neural networks may be used to model the dependency of the derivatives' price on one or several underlying assets. After giving a brief introduction to the problem of derivatives pricing we present experiments with German stock index options data showing that a regularized neural network trained with the IEKF outperforms several benchmark models and alternative learning procedures. In particular, the performance may be greatly improved using a newly designed neural network architecture that accounts for no-arbitrage pricing restrictions.
Dirk Ormoneit
Neural Networks1
1998 Averaging, maximum penalized likelihood and Bayesian estimation for improving Gaussian mixture probability density estimates
abstract
We apply the idea of averaging ensembles of estimators to probability density estimation. In particular, we use Gaussian mixture models which are important components in many neural-network applications. We investigate the performance of averaging using three data sets. For comparison, we employ two traditional regularization approaches, i.e., a maximum penalized likelihood approach and a Bayesian approach. In the maximum penalized likelihood approach we use penalty functions derived from conjugate Bayesian priors such that an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm can be used for training. In all experiments, the maximum penalized likelihood approach and averaging improved performance considerably if compared to a maximum likelihood approach. In two of the experiments, the maximum penalized likelihood approach outperformed averaging. In one experiment averaging was clearly superior. Our conclusion is that maximum penalized likelihood gives good results if the penalty term in the cost function is appropriate for the particular problem. If this is not the case, averaging is superior since it shows greater robustness by not relying on any particular prior assumption. The Bayesian approach worked very well on a low-dimensional toy problem but failed to give good performance in higher dimensional problems.
Dirk Ormoneit, Volker Tresp
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks1
1996 Experiments in predicting the German stock index DAX with density estimating neural networks
abstract
We compare the performance of multilayer perceptrons and density estimating neural networks in the task of forecasting the return and the volatility of the DAX index. We claim that for nontrivial target distributions, density estimating networks should lead to improved predictions. The reason is that the latter are capable of embodying more complex probability models for the target noise. We discuss appropriate distribution assumptions for the important cases of outliers and non constant variances, and give interpretations of the new estimates in regression theory.
Dirk Ormoneit, Ralph Neuneier
CIFEr1
1995 Improved Gaussian Mixture Density Estimates Using Bayesian Penalty Terms and Network Averaging
Dirk Ormoneit, Volker Tresp
NIPS1