EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bo Zhang 0071
dblp:36/2259-71
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 74% Information extraction and text analysis · 26% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text correction › spelling correction
chinese spelling check |
2.5 | 3 | 2025 | DISC: Plug-and-Play Decoding Intervention with Similarity of Characters for Chinese Spelling Check · ACL (1) 2025 A Training-free LLM-based Approach to General Chinese Character Error Correction · ACL (1) 2025 A Simple yet Effective Training-free Prompt-free Approach to Chinese Spelling Correction Based on Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text correction
spelling correction |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | A Training-free LLM-based Approach to General Chinese Character Error Correction · ACL (1) 2025 A Simple yet Effective Training-free Prompt-free Approach to Chinese Spelling Correction Based on Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
1.2 | 3 | 2022 | SynGEC: Syntax-Enhanced Grammatical Error Correction with a Tailored GEC-Oriented Parser · EMNLP 2022 Entity Relation Extraction as Dependency Parsing in Visually Rich Documents · EMNLP (1) 2021 Supervised Treebank Conversion: Data and Approaches · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
inference-time intervention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DISC: Plug-and-Play Decoding Intervention with Similarity of Characters for Chinese Spelling Check · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
constrained decoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Simple yet Effective Training-free Prompt-free Approach to Chinese Spelling Correction Based on Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
large language model decoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Simple yet Effective Training-free Prompt-free Approach to Chinese Spelling Correction Based on Large Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SynGEC: Syntax-Enhanced Grammatical Error Correction with a Tailored GEC-Oriented Parser · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Entity Relation Extraction as Dependency Parsing in Visually Rich Documents · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Supervised Treebank Conversion: Data and Approaches · ACL (1) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Training-free LLM-based Approach to General Chinese Character Error Correction · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Entity Relation Extraction as Dependency Parsing in Visually Rich Documents · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task learning · 0.9prompt-based LLM · 0.9plug-and-play decoding · 0.9levenshtein distance · 0.9character similarity · 0.9shape similarity · 0.8reward strategy · 0.8pronunciation similarity · 0.8syntax projection · 0.6graph convolution network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Training-free LLM-based Approach to General Chinese Character Error CorrectionabstractChinese spelling correction (CSC) is a crucial task that aims to correct character errors in Chinese text.While conventional CSC focuses on character substitution errors caused by mistyping, two other common types of character errors, missing and redundant characters, have received less attention.These errors are often excluded from CSC datasets during the annotation process or ignored during evaluation, even when they have been annotated.This issue limits the practicality of the CSC task.To address this issue, we introduce the task of General Chinese Character Error Correction (C2EC), which focuses on all three types of character errors.We construct a high-quality C2EC benchmark by combining and manually verifying data from CCTC and Lemon datasets.We extend the training-free prompt-free CSC method to C2EC by using Levenshtein distance for handling length changes and leveraging an additional prompt-based large language model (LLM) to improve performance.Experiments show that our method enables a 14B-parameter LLM to be on par with models nearly 50 times larger on both conventional CSC and C2EC tasks, without any fine-tuning. Houquan Zhou 0001, Bo Zhang 0071, Zhenghua Li, Ming Yan 0008, Min Zhang 0005 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | DISC: Plug-and-Play Decoding Intervention with Similarity of Characters for Chinese Spelling CheckabstractZiheng Qiao, Houquan Zhou, Yumeng Liu, Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang, Bo Zhang, Chen Li, Ji Zhang, Fei Huang. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Ziheng Qiao, Houquan Zhou 0001, Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang 0005, Bo Zhang 0071, Chen Li 0001, Ji Zhang 0011, Fei Huang 0002 |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2024 | A Simple yet Effective Training-free Prompt-free Approach to Chinese Spelling Correction Based on Large Language ModelsabstractThis work proposes a simple training-free prompt-free approach to leverage large language models (LLMs) for the Chinese spelling correction (CSC) task, which is totally different from all previous CSC approaches.The key idea is to use an LLM as a pure language model in a conventional manner.The LLM goes through the input sentence from the beginning, and at each inference step, produces a distribution over its vocabulary for deciding the next token, given a partial sentence.To ensure that the output sentence remains faithful to the input sentence, we design a minimal distortion model that utilizes pronunciation or shape similarities between the original and replaced characters.Furthermore, we propose two useful reward strategies to address practical challenges specific to the CSC task.Experiments on five public datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly improves LLM performance, enabling them to compete with state-of-the-art domain-general CSC models. Houquan Zhou 0001, Zhenghua Li, Bo Zhang 0071, Chen Li 0001, Shaopeng Lai, Ji Zhang 0011, Fei Huang 0002, Min Zhang 0005 |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2022 | SynGEC: Syntax-Enhanced Grammatical Error Correction with a Tailored GEC-Oriented ParserabstractThis work proposes a syntax-enhanced grammatical error correction (GEC) approach named SynGEC that effectively incorporates dependency syntactic information into the encoder part of GEC models. 1 The key challenge for this idea is that off-the-shelf parsers are unreliable when processing ungrammatical sentences.To confront this challenge, we propose to build a tailored GEC-oriented parser (GOPar) using parallel GEC training data as a pivot.First, we design an extended syntax representation scheme that allows us to represent both grammatical errors and syntax in a unified tree structure.Then, we obtain parse trees of the source incorrect sentences by projecting trees of the target correct sentences.Finally, we train GOPar with such projected trees.For GEC, we employ the graph convolution network to encode source-side syntactic information produced by GOPar, and fuse them with the outputs of the Transformer encoder.Experiments on mainstream English and Chinese GEC datasets show that our proposed SynGEC approach consistently and substantially outperforms strong baselines and achieves competitive performance. Yue Zhang 0004, Bo Zhang 0071, Zhenghua Li, Zuyi Bao, Chen Li 0001, Min Zhang 0005 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2022 | MuCGEC: a Multi-Reference Multi-Source Evaluation Dataset for Chinese Grammatical Error CorrectionabstractYue Zhang, Zhenghua Li, Zuyi Bao, Jiacheng Li, Bo Zhang, Chen Li, Fei Huang, Min Zhang. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Yue Zhang 0004, Zhenghua Li, Zuyi Bao, Bo Zhang 0071, Chen Li 0001, Fei Huang 0002, Min Zhang 0005 |
NAACL-HLT | 5 |
| 2021 | Entity Relation Extraction as Dependency Parsing in Visually Rich DocumentsabstractPrevious works on key information extraction from visually rich documents (VRDs) mainly focus on labeling the text within each bounding box (i.e., semantic entity), while the relations in-between are largely unexplored.In this paper, we adapt the popular dependency parsing model, the biaffine parser, to this entity relation extraction task.Being different from the original dependency parsing model which recognizes dependency relations between words, we identify relations between groups of words with layout information instead.We have compared different representations of the semantic entity, different VRD encoders, and different relation decoders.For the model training, we explore multi-task learning to combine entity labeling and relation extraction tasks; and for the evaluation, we conduct experiments on different datasets with filtering and augmentation.The results demonstrate that our proposed model achieves 65.96% F1 score on the FUNSD dataset.As for the realworld application, our model has been applied to the in-house customs data, achieving reliable performance in the production setting. Yue Zhang 0004, Bo Zhang 0071, Rui Wang 0005, Junjie Cao 0003, Chen Li 0001, Zuyi Bao |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | A Unified Span-Based Approach for Opinion Mining with Syntactic ConstituentsabstractQingrong Xia, Bo Zhang, Rui Wang, Zhenghua Li, Yue Zhang, Fei Huang, Luo Si, Min Zhang. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Qingrong Xia, Bo Zhang 0071, Rui Wang 0005, Zhenghua Li, Yue Zhang 0004, Fei Huang 0002, Luo Si, Min Zhang 0005 |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2020 | Syntax-Aware Opinion Role Labeling with Dependency Graph Convolutional NetworksabstractOpinion role labeling (ORL) is a fine-grained opinion analysis task and aims to answer "who expressed what kind of sentiment towards what?".Due to the scarcity of labeled data, ORL remains challenging for data-driven methods.In this work, we try to enhance neural ORL models with syntactic knowledge by comparing and integrating different representations.We also propose dependency graph convolutional networks (DEPGCN) to encode parser information at different processing levels.In order to compensate for parser inaccuracy and reduce error propagation, we introduce multi-task learning (MTL) to train the parser and the ORL model simultaneously.We verify our methods on the benchmark MPQA corpus.The experimental results show that syntactic information is highly valuable for ORL, and our final MTL model effectively boosts the F1 score by 9.29 over the syntaxagnostic baseline.In addition, we find that the contributions from syntactic knowledge do not fully overlap with contextualized word representations (BERT).Our best model achieves 4.34 higher F1 score than the current state-ofthe-art. Bo Zhang 0071, Yue Zhang 0004, Rui Wang 0005, Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang 0005 |
ACL | 1 |
| 2019 | Conversion and Exploitation of Dependency Treebanks with Full-Tree LSTM
Bo Zhang 0071, Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang 0005 |
NLPCC (2) | 1 |
| 2018 | Supervised Treebank Conversion: Data and ApproachesabstractTreebank conversion is a straightforward and effective way to exploit various heterogeneous treebanks for boosting parsing accuracy.However, previous work mainly focuses on unsupervised treebank conversion and makes little progress due to the lack of manually labeled data where each sentence has two syntactic trees complying with two different guidelines at the same time, referred as bi-tree aligned data.In this work, we for the first time propose the task of supervised treebank conversion.First, we manually construct a bi-tree aligned dataset containing over ten thousand sentences.Then, we propose two simple yet effective treebank conversion approaches (pattern embedding and treeLSTM) based on the state-of-the-art deep biaffine parser.Experimental results show that 1) the two approaches achieve comparable conversion accuracy, and 2) treebank conversion is superior to the widely used multi-task learning framework in multiple treebank exploitation and leads to significantly higher parsing accuracy.* The first two (student) authors make equal contributions to this work.Zhenghua is the correspondence author. Xinzhou Jiang, Zhenghua Li, Bo Zhang 0071, Min Zhang 0005, Sheng Li 0017, Luo Si |
ACL (1) | 3 |