Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Zhou 0030
dblp:36/2728-30
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Vision and language · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
contrastive data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
image augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
phrase grounding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Localizing Active Objects from Egocentric Vision with Symbolic World Knowledge · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
script knowledge |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-Sequential Graph Script Induction via Multimedia Grounding · ACL (1) 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › video-language understanding
video-text grounding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Non-Sequential Graph Script Induction via Multimedia Grounding · ACL (1) 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic data filtering · 0.9multimodal generative model · 0.9contrastive feature extraction · 0.9per-object aggregation masking · 0.7multimodal grounding · 0.7large language model · 0.7graph induction · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Contrastive Visual Data AugmentationabstractLarge multimodal models (LMMs) often struggle to recognize novel concepts, as they rely on pre-trained knowledge and have limited ability to capture subtle visual details. Domain-specific knowledge gaps in training also make them prone to confusing visually similar, commonly misrepresented, or low-resource concepts. To help LMMs better align nuanced visual features with language, improving their ability to recognize and reason about novel or rare concepts, we propose a Contrastive visual Data Augmentation (CoDA) strategy. CoDA extracts key contrastive textual and visual features of target concepts against the known concepts they are misrecognized as, and then uses multimodal generative models to produce targeted synthetic data. Automatic filtering of extracted features and augmented images is implemented to guarantee their quality, as verified by human annotators. We show the effectiveness and efficiency of CoDA on low-resource concept and diverse scene recognition datasets including INaturalist and SUN. We additionally collect NovelSpecies, a benchmark dataset consisting of newly discovered animal species that are guaranteed to be unseen by LMMs. LLaVA-1.6 1-shot updating results on these three datasets show CoDA significantly improves SOTA visual data augmentation strategies by 12.3% (NovelSpecies), 5.1% (SUN), and 6.0% (iNat) absolute gains in accuracy. Yu Zhou 0030, Mohan Tang, Xiaomeng Jin, Te-Lin Wu, Kuan-Hao Huang, Heng Ji 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Non-Sequential Graph Script Induction via Multimedia GroundingabstractOnline resources such as wikiHow compile a wide range of scripts for performing everyday tasks, which can assist models in learning to reason about procedures. 1 However, the scripts are always presented in a linear manner, which does not reflect the flexibility displayed by people executing tasks in real life.For example, in the CrossTask Dataset, 64.5% of consecutive step pairs are also observed in the reverse order, suggesting their ordering is not fixed.In addition, each step has an average of 2.56 frequent 2 next steps, demonstrating "branching".In this paper, we propose a new challenging task of non-sequential graph script induction, aiming to capture optional and interchangeable steps in procedural planning.To automate the induction of such graph scripts for given tasks, we propose to take advantage of loosely aligned videos of people performing the tasks.In particular, we design a multimodal framework to ground procedural videos to wikiHow textual steps and thus transform each video into an observed step path on the latent ground truth graph script.This key transformation enables us to train a script knowledge model capable of both generating explicit graph scripts for learnt tasks and predicting future steps given a partial step sequence.Our best model outperforms the strongest pure text/vision baselines by 17.52% absolute gains on F 1 @3 for next step prediction and 13.8% absolute gains on Acc@1 for partial sequence completion.Human evaluation shows our model outperforming the wikiHow linear baseline by 48.76% absolute gains in capturing sequential and non-sequential step relations. Yu Zhou 0030, Manling Li, Xudong Lin 0003, Shih-Fu Chang, Mohit Bansal, Heng Ji 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Localizing Active Objects from Egocentric Vision with Symbolic World KnowledgeabstractThe ability to actively ground task instructions from an egocentric view is crucial for AI agents to accomplish tasks or assist humans.One important step towards this goal is to localize and track key active objects that undergo major state change as a consequence of human actions/interactions in the environment (e.g., localizing and tracking the 'sponge' in video from the instruction "Dip the sponge into the bucket.")without being told exactly what/where to ground.While existing works approach this problem from a pure vision perspective, we investigate to which extent the language modality (i.e., task instructions) and their interaction with visual modality can be beneficial.Specifically, we propose to improve phrase grounding models' (Li* et al., 2022) ability in localizing the active objects by: (1) learning the role of objects undergoing change and accurately extracting them from the instructions, (2) leveraging pre-and post-conditions of the objects during actions, and (3) recognizing the objects more robustly with descriptional knowledge.We leverage large language models (LLMs) to extract the aforementioned actionobject knowledge, and design a per-object aggregation masking technique to effectively perform joint inference on object phrases with symbolic knowledge.We evaluate our framework on Ego4D ( Graumanet al., 2022) and Epic-Kitchens (Dunnhofer et al., 2022) datasets.Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework, which leads to > 54% improvements in all standard metrics on the TREK-150-OPE-Det localization + tracking task, > 7% improvements in all standard metrics on the TREK-150-OPE tracking task, and > 3% improvements in average precision (AP) on the Ego4D SCOD task. Te-Lin Wu, Yu Zhou 0030, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |