Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Khew-Voon Chin
dblp:36/2974
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
disease classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
penalized regression · 0.1parametric bootstrap · 0.1logistic regression · 0.1local false discovery rate · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n caseabstractMOTIVATION: Logistic regression is a standard method for building prediction models for a binary outcome and has been extended for disease classification with microarray data by many authors. A feature (gene) selection step, however, must be added to penalized logistic modeling due to a large number of genes and a small number of subjects. Model selection for this two-step approach requires new statistical tools because prediction error estimation ignoring the feature selection step can be severely downward biased. Generic methods such as cross-validation and non-parametric bootstrap can be very ineffective due to the big variability in the prediction error estimate. RESULTS: We propose a parametric bootstrap model for more accurate estimation of the prediction error that is tailored to the microarray data by borrowing from the extensive research in identifying differentially expressed genes, especially the local false discovery rate. The proposed method provides guidance on the two critical issues in model selection: the number of genes to include in the model and the optimal shrinkage for the penalized logistic regression. We show that selecting more than 20 genes usually helps little in further reducing the prediction error. Application to Golub's leukemia data and our own cervical cancer data leads to highly accurate prediction models. AVAILABILITY: R library GeneLogit at http://geocities.com/jg_liao J. G. Liao, Khew-Voon Chin |
Bioinform. | 2 |