Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard D. Fennell

dblp:36/4531 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1984
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data models and query languages · 54% Database system architecture and tuning · 41% Information retrieval · 5%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Speech recognition and synthesis · 80% Multi-agent systems · 10% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 10%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 46% Distributed systems · 40% Performance modeling and evaluation · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning › database system implementation
database management system design
0.011984
A Database Management System for the Federal Courts · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984
Data models and query languages › data modeling
network data model
0.011984
A Database Management System for the Federal Courts · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding
0.031977
Parallelism in Artificial Intelligence Problem Solving: A Case Study of Hearsay II · IEEE Trans. Computers 1977
The Hearsay- I Speech Understanding System: An Example of the Recognition Process · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
System Organizations for Speech Understanding: Implications of Network and Multiprocessor Computer Architectures for AI · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Computational social science and digital humanities
legal informatics
0.011977
An Intelligent Information System for Criminal Case Management in the Federal Courts · IJCAI 1977
Data models and query languages
data manipulation language
0.011984
A Database Management System for the Federal Courts · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge-based systems
0.011976
The Hearsay- I Speech Understanding System: An Example of the Recognition Process · IEEE Trans. Computers 1976
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › parallel architecture simulation
multiprocessor simulation
0.011977
Parallelism in Artificial Intelligence Problem Solving: A Case Study of Hearsay II · IEEE Trans. Computers 1977

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

macro facilities · 0.0dynamic data structuring · 0.0resource allocation · 0.0knowledge sources · 0.0interprocess communication · 0.0information system design · 0.0hypothesize-and-test paradigm · 0.0hypothesize-and-test · 0.0case-based reasoning · 0.0blackboard architecture · 0.0hypothesis prediction and verification · 0.0cooperating independent processes · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1984 A Database Management System for the Federal Courts
abstract
A judicial systems laboratory has been established and several large-scale information management systems projects have been undertaken within the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, D.C. The newness of the court application area, together with the experimental nature of the initial prototypes, required that the system building tools be as flexible and efficient as possible for effective software design and development. The size of the databases, the expected transaction volumes, and the long-term value of the court records required a data manipulation system capable of providing high performance and integrity. The resulting design criteria, the programming capabilities developed, and their use in system construction are described herein. This database programming facility has been especially designed as a technical management tool for the database administrator, while providing the applications programmer with a flexible database software interface for high productivity. Specifically, a network-type database management system using SAIL as the data manipulation host language is described. Generic data manipulation verb formats using SAIL's macro facilities and dynamic data structuring facilities allowing in-core database representations have been developed to achieve a level of flexibility not usually attained in conventional database systems.
Jack R. Buchanan, Richard D. Fennell, Hanan Samet
ACM Trans. Database Syst.2
1977 An Intelligent Information System for Criminal Case Management in the Federal Courts
Jack R. Buchanan, Richard D. Fennell
IJCAI2
1977 Parallelism in Artificial Intelligence Problem Solving: A Case Study of Hearsay II
abstract
The Hearsay II speech-understanding system (HSII) (Lesser et al [11], Fennell [9], and Erman and Lesser [6]) is an implementation of a knowledge-based multiprocessing artificial intelligence (AI) problem-solving organization. HSII is intended to represent a problem-solving organization which is applicable for implementation in a parallel hardware environment such as C.mmp (Bell et al [2]). The primary characteristics of this organization include: 1) multiple, diverse, independent and asynchronously executing knowledge sources (KS's), 2) cooperating (in terms of control) via a generalized form of the hypothesize-and-test paradigm involving the data-directed invocation of KS processes, and 3) communicating (in terms of data) via a shared blackboard-like data base in which the current data state is held in a homogeneous, multidimensional, directed-graph structure. The object of this paper is to explore several of the ramifications of such a problem-solving organization by examining the mechanisms and policies underlying HSII which are necessary for supporting its organization as a multiprocessing system. In addition, a multiprocessor simulation study is presented which details the effects of actually implementing such a parallel organization for use in a particular application area, that of speech understanding.
Richard D. Fennell, Victor R. Lesser
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1976 System Organizations for Speech Understanding: Implications of Network and Multiprocessor Computer Architectures for AI
abstract
This paper considers various factors affecting system em organization for speech understanding research. The structure of the Hearsay system based on a set of cooperating, independent processes using the hypothesize-and-test paradigm is presented. Design considerations for the effective use of multiprocessor and network achitectures in speech understanding systems ems are presented: control of processes, interprocess communication and data sharing, resource allocation, and debugging are discussed.1
Lee D. Erman, Richard D. Fennell, Victor R. Lesser, Raj Reddy
IEEE Trans. Computers2
1976 The Hearsay- I Speech Understanding System: An Example of the Recognition Process
abstract
This paper describes the structure and operation of the Hearsay-I1speech understanding system by the use of a specific example illustrating the various stages of recognition. The system consists of a set of cooperating independent processes, each representing a source of knowledge. The knowledge is used either to predict what may appear in a given context or to verify hypotheses resulting from a prediction. The structure of the system is illustrated by considering its operation in a particular task situation: Voice-Chess. The representation and use of various sources of knowledge are outlined. Preliminary results of the reduction in search resulting from the use of various sources of knowledge are given.
Raj Reddy, Lee D. Erman, Richard D. Fennell, Richard B. Neely
IEEE Trans. Computers3