Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ning Tan 0002

dblp:36/4620-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 77% Computational complexity · 23%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.322014
On the Power of Symmetric LP and SDP Relaxations · CCC 2014
Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies · SODA 2012
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.212014
On the Power of Symmetric LP and SDP Relaxations · CCC 2014
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
Max-CSP
0.212014
On the Power of Symmetric LP and SDP Relaxations · CCC 2014
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem
0.212014
On the Power of Symmetric LP and SDP Relaxations · CCC 2014
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.112012
Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies · SODA 2012
Mathematical optimization › constraint programming › global constraints
global cardinality constraint
0.112012
Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies · SODA 2012
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
lasserre hierarchy
0.112012
Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies · SODA 2012
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
rounding
0.112012
Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies · SODA 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sum-of-squares hierarchy · 0.2lasserre relaxation · 0.2dictatorship testing · 0.1SDP hierarchy · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 On the Power of Symmetric LP and SDP Relaxations
abstract
We study the computational power of general symmetric relaxations for combinatorial optimization problems, both in the linear programming (LP) and semidefinite programming (SDP) case. We show new connections to explicit LP and SDP relaxations, like those obtained from standard hierarchies. Concretely, for kkn) achieve best-possible k approximation guarantees for Max CSPs among all symmetric SDP relaxations of size at most (kn). This result gives the first k lower bounds for symmetric SDPrelaxations of Max CSPs, and indicates that the sum-of-squares method provides the “right” SDP relaxation for this class of problems. Moreover, for k2k) for the traveling salesman problem that achieve per instance best-possible approximation (kn).
James R. Lee, Prasad Raghavendra, David Steurer, Ning Tan 0002
CCC4
2012 Approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies
abstract
This work is concerned with approximating constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) with additional global cardinality constraints. For example, Max Cut is a boolean CSP where the input is a graph G = (V, E) and the goal is to find a cut S ∪ Š = V that maximizes the number of crossing edges, |E(S, Š)|. The Max Bisection problem is a variant of Max Cut with a global constraint that each side of the cut has exactly half the vertices, i.e., |S| = |V|/2. Several other natural optimization problems like Min Bisection and approximating Graph Expansion can be formulated as CSPs with global cardinality constraints. In this work, we formulate a general approach towards approximating CSPs with global cardinality constraints using SDP hierarchies. To demonstrate the approach we present the following results: Using the Lasserre hierarchy, we present an algorithm that runs in time O(npoly(1/ε)) that given an instance of Max Bisection with value 1 − ε, finds a bisection with value 1 − O(√ε). This approximation is near-optimal (up to constant factors in O) under the Unique Games Conjecture. By a computer-assisted proof, we show that the same algorithm also achieves a 0.85-approximation for Max Bisection, improving on the previous bound of 0.70 (note that it is Unique Games hard to approximate better than a 0.878 factor). The same algorithm also yields a 0.92-approximation for Max 2-Sat with cardinality constraints. For every CSP with a global cardinality constraints, we present a generic conversion from integrality gap instances for the Lasserre hierarchy to a dictatorship test whose soundness is at most integrality gap. Dictatorship testing gadgets are central to hardness results for CSPs, and a generic conversion of the above nature lies at the core of the tight Unique Games based hardness result for CSPs [Rag08].
Prasad Raghavendra, Ning Tan 0002
SODA2