Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Piepenbrock

dblp:36/4668 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation › DNA methylation analysis
bisulfite sequencing
0.012004
Quantitative DNA methylation analysis based on four-dye trace data from direct sequencing of PCR amplificates · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis
0.012004
Quantitative DNA methylation analysis based on four-dye trace data from direct sequencing of PCR amplificates · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation › DNA methylation analysis
methylation level estimation
0.012004
Quantitative DNA methylation analysis based on four-dye trace data from direct sequencing of PCR amplificates · Bioinform. 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.012002
Statistical process control for large scale microarray experiments · ISMB 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.011999
Recurrent Cortical Competition: Strengthen or Weaken? · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural computation
0.011999
Recurrent Cortical Competition: Strengthen or Weaken? · NIPS 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamical systems modeling · 0.0signal normalization · 0.0basecaller artifact handling · 0.0t² control chart · 0.0principal component analysis · 0.0multivariate statistical process control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Quantitative DNA methylation analysis based on four-dye trace data from direct sequencing of PCR amplificates
abstract
MOTIVATION: Methylation of cytosines in DNA plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression, and the analysis of methylation patterns is fundamental for the understanding of cell differentiation, aging processes, diseases and cancer development. Such analysis has been limited, because technologies for detailed and efficient high-throughput studies have not been available. We have developed a novel quantitative methylation analysis algorithm and workflow based on direct DNA sequencing of PCR products from bisulfite-treated DNA with high-throughput sequencing machines. This technology is a prerequisite for success of the Human Epigenome Project, the first large genome-wide sequencing study for DNA methylation in many different tissues. Methylation in tissue samples which are compositions of different cells is a quantitative information represented by cytosine/thymine proportions after bisulfite conversion of unmethylated cytosines to uracil and PCR. Calculation of quantitative methylation information from base proportions represented by different dye signals in four-dye sequencing trace files needs a specific algorithm handling imbalanced and overscaled signals, incomplete conversion, quality problems and basecaller artifacts. RESULTS: The algorithm we developed has several key properties: it analyzes trace files from PCR products of bisulfite-treated DNA sequenced directly on ABI machines; it yields quantitative methylation measurements for individual cytosine positions after alignment with genomic reference sequences, signal normalization and estimation of effectiveness of bisulfite treatment; it works in a fully automated pipeline including data quality monitoring; it is efficient and avoids the usual cost of multiple sequencing runs on subclones to estimate DNA methylation. The power of our new algorithm is demonstrated with data from two test systems based on mixtures with known base compositions and defined methylation. In addition, the applicability is proven by identifying CpGs that are differentially methylated in real tissue samples.
Jörn Lewin, Armin Otto Schmitt, Péter Adorján, Thomas Hildmann 0002, Christian Piepenbrock
Bioinform.5
2002 Statistical process control for large scale microarray experiments
abstract
MOTIVATION: Maintaining and controlling data quality is a key problem in large scale microarray studies. In particular systematic changes in experimental conditions across multiple chips can seriously affect quality and even lead to false biological conclusions. Traditionally the influence of these effects can be minimized only by expensive repeated measurements, because a detailed understanding of all process relevant parameters seems impossible. RESULTS: We introduce a novel method for microarray process control that estimates quality based solely on the distribution of the actual measurements without requiring repeated experiments. A robust version of principle component analysis detects single outlier microarrays and thereby enables the use of techniques from multivariate statistical process control. In particular, the T(2) control chart reliably tracks undesired changes in process relevant parameters. This can be used to improve the microarray process itself, limits necessary repetitions to only affected samples and therefore maintains quality in a cost effective way. We prove the power of the approach on 3 large sets of DNA methylation microarray data.
Fabian Model, Christian Piepenbrock, Péter Adorján
ISMB3
1999 Recurrent Cortical Competition: Strengthen or Weaken?
Péter Adorján, Lars Schwabe, Christian Piepenbrock, Klaus Obermayer
NIPS3
1999 Effects of lateral competition in the primary visual cortex on the development of topographic projections and ocular dominance maps
Christian Piepenbrock, Klaus Obermayer
Neurocomputing1
1998 The Role of Lateral Cortical Competition in Ocular Dominance Development
Christian Piepenbrock, Klaus Obermayer
NIPS1
1997 The Joint Development of Orientation and Ocular Dominance: Role of Constraints
abstract
Correlation-based learning (CBL) has been suggested as the mechanism that underlies the development of simple-cell receptive fields in the primary visual cortex of cats, including orientation preference (OR) and ocular dominance (OD) (Linsker, 1986; Miller, Keller, & Stryker, 1989). CBL has been applied successfully to the development of OR and OD individually (Miller, Keller, & Stryker, 1989; Miller, 1994; Miyashita & Tanaka, 1991; Erwin, Obermayer, & Schulten, 1995), but the conditions for their joint development have not been studied (but see Erwin & Miller, 1995, for independent work on the same question) in contrast to competitive Hebbian models (Obermayer, Blasdel, & Schulten, 1992). In this article, we provide insight into why this has been the case: OR and OD decouple in symmetric CBL models, and a joint development of OR and OD is possible only in a parameter regime that depends on nonlinear mechanisms.
Christian Piepenbrock, Helge J. Ritter, Klaus Obermayer
Neural Comput.1
1996 Cortical Map Development Driven by Spontaneous Retinal Activity Waves
Christian Piepenbrock, Helge J. Ritter, Klaus Obermayer
ICANN1
1996 Linear Correlation-Based Learning Models Require a Two-Stage Process for the Development of Orientation and Ocular Dominance
Christian Piepenbrock, Helge J. Ritter, Klaus Obermayer
Neural Process. Lett.1