Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Tadayoshi Horita

dblp:36/5108 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 53% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 16% Parallel and multicore computing · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › reconfigurable architecture
reconfigurable arrays
0.012000
Fault-Tolerant Processor Arrays Based on the 1½-Track Switches with Flexible Spare Distributions · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000
Parallel and multicore computing › array processor
mesh-connected processor array
0.012000
Fault-Tolerant Processor Arrays Based on the 1½-Track Switches with Flexible Spare Distributions · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multicore design
0.012000
Fault-Tolerant Processor Arrays Based on the 1½-Track Switches with Flexible Spare Distributions · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000
Electronic design automation › design for manufacturability › design for yield
yield enhancement
0.012000
Fault-Tolerant Processor Arrays Based on the 1½-Track Switches with Flexible Spare Distributions · IEEE Trans. Computers 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

single-track switches · 0.0compensation path reconfiguration · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 An FPGA-based multiple-weight-and-neuron-fault tolerant digital multilayer perceptron
Tadayoshi Horita, Itsuo Takanami
Neurocomputing1
2012 A Built-in Circuit for Self-Repairing Mesh-Connected Processor Arrays by Direct Spare Replacement
abstract
We present a self-repairing circuit for a mesh-connected processor array with faulty processing elements which are directly replaced by spare processing elements on two orthogonal lines at the edges of the array. First, the spare assignment problem is formalized as a matching problem in graph theory. Using the result, we present an algorithm for reconstructing the array in a convenient form for finding the matching by a logical circuit. Second, the logical circuit which exactly realizes the algorithm is given. The circuit can be embedded in a target processor array to reconstruct very quickly the array with faulty processing elements without the aid of a host computer. This implies that the proposed system is effective in enhancing especially the run-time reliability of a processor array.
Itsuo Takanami, Tadayoshi Horita
PRDC2
2001 Analytical Results for Reconfiguration of E-11/2- Track Switch Torus Arrays with Multiple Fault Types
abstract
For a redundant (array) system, he (or she) who considers that the total system reliability might be worse than a nonredundant system because of additional circuit faults might naturally say, "Is the redundancy really useful?". The main purpose of the paper is to answer the question for redundant array systems using E-1 1/2 track switches (Tadayoshi Horita and Itsuo Takanami, 2000) and a reconfiguration method. The answer is "the redundancy using these methods is useful!". Furthermore, the condition that the assumption that additional circuits such as tracks, switches, etc. are fault-free becomes valid is given.
Tadayoshi Horita, Itsuo Takanami
PRDC1
2000 Fault-Tolerant Processor Arrays Based on the 1½-Track Switches with Flexible Spare Distributions
abstract
A mesh-connected processor array consists of many similar processing elements (PEs) which can be executed in both parallel and pipeline processing. For the implementation of an array of large numbers of processors, some fault-tolerant issues are necessary to enhance the (fabrication-time) yield and the (run-time) reliability. In this paper, we propose a fault-tolerant reconfigurable processor array using single-track switches like Kung et al.'s model. The reconfiguration process in our model is executed based on the concept of the "compensation path" like Kung et al.'s method, too. In our model, spare PEs are not necessarily put around the array, but are more flexibly put in the array by changing connections between spare PEs and nonspare PEs while retaining the connections among nonspare PEs in the same manner in Kung et al.'s model. The proposed model has such a desirable property that physical distances between logically adjacent PEs in the reconfigured array are within a constant, that is, independent of sizes of arrays. We show that the hardware overhead of the proposed model is a little greater than that of Kung et al.'s model, while the yield of the proposed model is much better than that of Kung et al.'s model.
Tadayoshi Horita, Itsuo Takanami
IEEE Trans. Computers1