Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Paul S. Herrnson

dblp:36/5122 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0003-2970-3933ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Usability and user experience research · 77% Interaction techniques and input · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
ballot secrecy		 0.112010
Scantegrity II Municipal Election at Takoma Park: The First E2E Binding Governmental Election with Ballot Privacy · USENIX Security Symposium 2010
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › electronic voting
end-to-end verifiable e-voting		 0.112010
Scantegrity II Municipal Election at Takoma Park: The First E2E Binding Governmental Election with Ballot Privacy · USENIX Security Symposium 2010
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
voting		 0.012010
Scantegrity II Municipal Election at Takoma Park: The First E2E Binding Governmental Election with Ballot Privacy · USENIX Security Symposium 2010
Interaction techniques and input
touch interaction		 0.012003
Electronic voting system usability issues · CHI 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

usability evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Scantegrity II Municipal Election at Takoma Park: The First E2E Binding Governmental Election with Ballot Privacy
Richard Carback, David Chaum, Jeremy Clark, John Conway, Aleksander Essex, Paul S. Herrnson, Travis Mayberry, Stefan Popoveniuc, Ronald L. Rivest, Emily Shen, Alan T. Sherman, Poorvi L. Vora
 USENIX Security Symposium6
2009 Electronic voting eliminates hanging chads but introduces new usability challenges
Frederick G. Conrad, Benjamin B. Bederson, Brian Lewis, Emilia Peytcheva, Michael Traugott, Michael J. Hanmer, Paul S. Herrnson, Richard G. Niemi
 Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.7
2003 Electronic voting system usability issues
abstract
With recent troubles in U.S. elections, there has been a nationwide push to update voting systems. Municipalities are investing heavily in electronic voting systems, many of which use a touch screen. These systems offer the promise of faster and more accurate voting, but the current reality is that they are fraught with usability and systemic problems. This paper surveys issues relating to usability of electronic voting systems and reports on a series of studies, including one with 415 voters using new systems that the State of Maryland purchased. Our analysis shows these systems work well, but have several problems, and many voters have concerns about them.
Benjamin B. Bederson, Bongshin Lee, Robert M. Sherman, Paul S. Herrnson, Richard G. Niemi
 CHI4