Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher J. Glass

dblp:36/5127 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 94% Electronic design automation · 6%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › routing algorithms
wormhole routing
0.031996
Fault-Tolerant Wormhole Routing in Meshes without Virtual Channels · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · J. ACM 1994
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · ISCA 1992
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › routing algorithms
adaptive routing
0.021994
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · J. ACM 1994
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · ISCA 1992
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network topology
0.021996
Fault-Tolerant Wormhole Routing in Meshes without Virtual Channels · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · ISCA 1992
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › routing algorithms
fault-tolerant routing
0.011996
Fault-Tolerant Wormhole Routing in Meshes without Virtual Channels · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network topology
mesh network
0.011996
Fault-Tolerant Wormhole Routing in Meshes without Virtual Channels · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1996
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
routing algorithms
0.011994
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · J. ACM 1994
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › routing algorithms
turn model
0.011994
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · J. ACM 1994
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › routing algorithms › adaptive routing
deadlock-free adaptive routing
0.011992
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · ISCA 1992
Electronic design automation › physical design
routing
0.011992
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · ISCA 1992
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network topology › static interconnection networks
mesh and hypercube topology
0.011992
The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing · ISCA 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault-tolerant routing · 0.0deadlock avoidance · 0.0simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Fault-Tolerant Wormhole Routing in Meshes without Virtual Channels
Christopher J. Glass, Lionel M. Ni
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1
1994 The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing
abstract
This paper presents a model for designing wormhole routing algorithms, A unique
Christopher J. Glass, Lionel M. Ni
J. ACM1
1992 Adaptive Routing in Mesh-Connected Networks
abstract
It is shown that wormhole routing in mesh-connected networks can be deadlock free and adaptive without the addition of channels to the basic topology. Several partially adaptive routing algorithms for 2-D and 3-D meshes are described and simulated for a variety of conditions. Simulations of policies for selecting input channels show that transmitting extra information in the header flits can reduce communication latencies at high network throughputs. Simulations of policies for selecting output channels show that avoiding turns reduces latencies at high throughputs. Unrestricted nonminimal routing is found to reduce latencies slightly at low throughputs but increase latencies significantly at high throughputs. For nonuniform traffic patterns, a partially adaptive routing algorithm performs better than a nonadaptive one.>
Christopher J. Glass, Lionel M. Ni
ICDCS1
1992 Maximally Fully Adaptive Routing in 2D Meshes
Christopher J. Glass, Lionel M. Ni
ICPP (1)1
1992 The Turn Model for Adaptive Routing
abstract
We present a model for designing wormhole routing algorithms that are deadlock free, livelock free, minimal or nonminimal, and maximally adaptive. A unique feature of this model is that it is not based on adding physical or virtual channels to network topologies (though it can be applied to networks with extra channels). Instead, the model is based on analyzing the directions in which packets can turn in a network and the cycles that the turns can form. Prohibiting just enough turns to break all of the cycles produces routing algorithms that are deadlock free, livelock free, minimal or nonminimal, and maximally adaptive for the network. In this paper, we focus on the two most common network topologies for wormhole routing, n-dimensional mesh, just a quarter of the turns must be prohibited to prevent deadlock. The remaining three quarters of the turns permit partial adaptiveness in routing. Partially adaptive routing algorithms are described for 2D meshes, n-dimensional meshes, k-ary n-cubes, and hypercubes. Simulations of partially adaptive and nonadaptive routing algorithms for 2D meshes and hypercubes show that which algorithm has the lowest latencies and highest sustainable throughput depends on the pattern of message traffic. For nonuniform traffic, partially adaptive routing algorithms perform better than non-adaptive ones.
Christopher J. Glass, Lionel M. Ni
ISCA1