Anna M. Borghi

dblp:36/518 · also Annamaria Borghi · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
0as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9455-8408ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 8 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 8 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Interfering with inner speech during action encoding impacts their execution
Angelo Mattia Gervasi, Claudia Mazzuca, Anna M. Borghi, Claudio Brozzoli
CogSci3
2025 Interactive Dynamics with Concepts Varying in Abstractness and Vagueness
Chiara De Livio, Claudia Mazzuca, Viola Chillura, Valerio Sperati, Anna M. Borghi
CogSci5
2025 The techno-social turn: how digital technologies reshape minds, bodies, and relationships
abstract
1. Digital technology has rapidly permeated multiple facets of life. The limitless access to real-time information and social platforms through smartphones, coupled with the new frontiers of artifi...
Chiara Fini, Vanessa Era, Takahiko Koike, Salvatore M. Aglioti, Anna M. Borghi, Dimitris Bolis
Behav. Inf. Technol.5
2024 The TECo Database: Insights on The Semantic Organization of The Ecological Domain
Ilenia Falcinelli, Chiara Fini, Claudia Mazzuca, Anna M. Borghi
CogSci4
2024 Spatial demonstratives and physical control
Angelo Mattia Gervasi, Anna M. Borghi, Francesco Mannella, Luca Tummolini
CogSci2
2024 Perceived Vocal Congruence Varies Across Gender Identities
Chiara De Livio, Claudia Mazzuca, Chiara Fini, Anna M. Borghi
CogSci4
2024 Abstract Sentences elicit more Uncertainty and Curiosity than Concrete Sentences
Claudia Mazzuca, Caterina Villani, Tommaso Lamarra, Marianna Bolognesi, Anna M. Borghi
CogSci5
2024 The Fundamental Flexibility of Abstract Words
Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi, Anna M. Borghi, Nick Chater, Morten H. Christiansen, Chiara Fini, Dedre Gentner, Angelo Mattia Gervasi, Daniel C. King, Francesco Mannella, Claudia Mazzuca, Luca Tummolini, Julian Zubek
CogSci2
2023 Abstract Concepts and Inner Speech: A Dual-Task Interference Study
Johanne Nedergaard, Anna M. Borghi, Marta Kapielska
CogSci2
2020 When me is mine: An embodied origin of psychological ownership?
Aurora De Bortoli Vizioli, Anna M. Borghi, Luca Tummolini
CogSci2
2016 Seeing the Bees Buzz and Hearing the Diamonds Glisten: The Effect of the Mode of Presentation of Stimuli on the Modality-Switch Effect
Elisa Scerrati, Luisa Lugli, Anna M. Borghi, Roberto Nicoletti
CogSci3
2014 Sound-symbolic correspondences with figures of known entities
Andrea Flumini, Mariagrazia Ranzini, Anna M. Borghi
CogSci3
2013 Body movements affect Counting
Luisa Lugli, Giulia Baroni, Filomena Anelli, Anna M. Borghi, Roberto Nicoletti
CogSci4
2012 Human and robotics hands grasping danger
abstract
Behavioural and neuroscience studies have shown that observing objects activates affordances, evoking motor responses. The aim of the present study is twofold. First, we intend to investigate whether children are sensitive to the distinction between neutral/graspable (affordances) and dangerous objects. Second, we aim to verify whether children's responses are modulated also by the agent who is interacting with the objects (human hand contrasted with robot hand, and male hand contrasted to female hand). We conducted an experiment on school-age children using a priming paradigm: a prime given by a hand or a control object was followed by graspable or dangerous objects. Children were required to categorize them into artefacts or natural objects by pressing two keys on a keyboard. Our results clearly showed that children are able to distinguish between neutral and dangerous objects: the latter produced an interference effect. In addition, we demonstrated that children are sensitive to the difference between actions performed by biological and non-biological agents: responses were faster when the prime was a grasping hand of a human compared to control stimuli. Results were interpreted in terms of gradient of vulnerability (female hand induced the most inhibition, while robot hand induced the least one) and of motor resonance (resonance is higher when the similarity between the hand prime and the participant's hand is higher).
Filomena Anelli, Roberto Nicoletti, Sinan Kalkan, Erol Sahin, Anna M. Borghi
IJCNN5