EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna M. Borghi
dblp:36/518 · also Annamaria Borghi
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
0as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9455-8408ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 8 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 8 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Interfering with inner speech during action encoding impacts their execution
Angelo Mattia Gervasi, Claudia Mazzuca, Anna M. Borghi, Claudio Brozzoli |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2025 | Interactive Dynamics with Concepts Varying in Abstractness and Vagueness
Chiara De Livio, Claudia Mazzuca, Viola Chillura, Valerio Sperati, Anna M. Borghi |
CogSci | 5 |
| 2025 | The techno-social turn: how digital technologies reshape minds, bodies, and relationshipsabstract1. Digital technology has rapidly permeated multiple facets of life. The limitless access to real-time information and social platforms through smartphones, coupled with the new frontiers of artifi... Chiara Fini, Vanessa Era, Takahiko Koike, Salvatore M. Aglioti, Anna M. Borghi, Dimitris Bolis |
Behav. Inf. Technol. | 5 |
| 2024 | The TECo Database: Insights on The Semantic Organization of The Ecological Domain
Ilenia Falcinelli, Chiara Fini, Claudia Mazzuca, Anna M. Borghi |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2024 | Spatial demonstratives and physical control
Angelo Mattia Gervasi, Anna M. Borghi, Francesco Mannella, Luca Tummolini |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2024 | Perceived Vocal Congruence Varies Across Gender Identities
Chiara De Livio, Claudia Mazzuca, Chiara Fini, Anna M. Borghi |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2024 | Abstract Sentences elicit more Uncertainty and Curiosity than Concrete Sentences
Claudia Mazzuca, Caterina Villani, Tommaso Lamarra, Marianna Bolognesi, Anna M. Borghi |
CogSci | 5 |
| 2024 | The Fundamental Flexibility of Abstract Words
Joanna Raczaszek-Leonardi, Anna M. Borghi, Nick Chater, Morten H. Christiansen, Chiara Fini, Dedre Gentner, Angelo Mattia Gervasi, Daniel C. King, Francesco Mannella, Claudia Mazzuca, Luca Tummolini, Julian Zubek |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2023 | Abstract Concepts and Inner Speech: A Dual-Task Interference Study
Johanne Nedergaard, Anna M. Borghi, Marta Kapielska |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2020 | When me is mine: An embodied origin of psychological ownership?
Aurora De Bortoli Vizioli, Anna M. Borghi, Luca Tummolini |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2016 | Seeing the Bees Buzz and Hearing the Diamonds Glisten: The Effect of the Mode of Presentation of Stimuli on the Modality-Switch Effect
Elisa Scerrati, Luisa Lugli, Anna M. Borghi, Roberto Nicoletti |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2014 | Sound-symbolic correspondences with figures of known entities
Andrea Flumini, Mariagrazia Ranzini, Anna M. Borghi |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2013 | Body movements affect Counting
Luisa Lugli, Giulia Baroni, Filomena Anelli, Anna M. Borghi, Roberto Nicoletti |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2012 | Human and robotics hands grasping dangerabstractBehavioural and neuroscience studies have shown that observing objects activates affordances, evoking motor responses. The aim of the present study is twofold. First, we intend to investigate whether children are sensitive to the distinction between neutral/graspable (affordances) and dangerous objects. Second, we aim to verify whether children's responses are modulated also by the agent who is interacting with the objects (human hand contrasted with robot hand, and male hand contrasted to female hand). We conducted an experiment on school-age children using a priming paradigm: a prime given by a hand or a control object was followed by graspable or dangerous objects. Children were required to categorize them into artefacts or natural objects by pressing two keys on a keyboard. Our results clearly showed that children are able to distinguish between neutral and dangerous objects: the latter produced an interference effect. In addition, we demonstrated that children are sensitive to the difference between actions performed by biological and non-biological agents: responses were faster when the prime was a grasping hand of a human compared to control stimuli. Results were interpreted in terms of gradient of vulnerability (female hand induced the most inhibition, while robot hand induced the least one) and of motor resonance (resonance is higher when the similarity between the hand prime and the participant's hand is higher). Filomena Anelli, Roberto Nicoletti, Sinan Kalkan, Erol Sahin, Anna M. Borghi |
IJCNN | 5 |