Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tong Liu 0004

dblp:36/5558-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5863-4351ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › algorithm engineering
algorithm selection
0.612022
sunny-as2: Enhancing SUNNY for Algorithm Selection (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wrapper-based feature selection · 0.6k-nearest neighbor · 0.6greedy search · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On the Evaluation of (Meta-)solver Approaches
abstract
Meta-solver approaches exploit many individual solvers to potentially build a better solver. To assess the performance of meta-solvers, one can adopt the metrics typically used for individual solvers (e.g., runtime or solution quality) or employ more specific evaluation metrics (e.g., by measuring how close the meta-solver gets to its virtual best performance). In this paper, based on some recently published works, we provide an overview of different performance metrics for evaluating (meta-)solvers by exposing their strengths and weaknesses.
Roberto Amadini, Maurizio Gabbrielli, Tong Liu 0004, Jacopo Mauro
J. Artif. Intell. Res.3
2022 sunny-as2: Enhancing SUNNY for Algorithm Selection (Extended Abstract)
abstract
SUNNY is a k-nearest neighbors based Algorithm Selection (AS) approach that schedules and runs a number of solvers for a given unforeseen problem. In this work we present sunny-as2, an enhancement of SUNNY for generic AS scenarios that advances the original approach with wrapper-based feature selection, neighborhood-size configuration and a greedy approach to speed-up the training phase. Empirical evidence shows that sunny-as2 is competitive w.r.t. state-of-the-art AS approaches.
Tong Liu 0004, Roberto Amadini, Maurizio Gabbrielli, Jacopo Mauro
IJCAI1
2021 Correlation graph analytics for stock time series data
abstract
Stock market events are hard to model. In recent years, one approach that has been receiving increasing attention is to analyze graphs induced by price correlations of different stock companies. By analyzing the structure of such graphs, it is possible to identify critical events, e.g., market crises. To the best of our knowledge, there are no tools available that offer comprehensive support for such analyses. This paper introduces a novel tool that offers in-depth analysis with the ability of fine tuning parameters with an intuitive user interface. With a proposed workflow to handle time series data, the tool becomes versatile and it can analyze correlation graphs of different semantics: minimum spanning tree, graphs with edge thresholds, and evolving graphs. It also provides a rich set of functions that enable users to explore easily, interactively and systematically the correlation graphs starting from a file of raw time series data. With real-world stock data, we demonstrate how straightforward yet effective it is to accomplish various analytical tasks with the proposed tool.
Tong Liu 0004, Paolo Coletti, Anton Dignös, Johann Gamper, Maurizio Murgia 0002
EDBT1
2021 sunny-as2: Enhancing SUNNY for Algorithm Selection
abstract
SUNNY is an Algorithm Selection (AS) technique originally tailored for Constraint Programming (CP). SUNNY is based on the k-nearest neighbors algorithm and enables one to schedule, from a portfolio of solvers, a subset of solvers to be run on a given CP problem. This approach has proved to be effective for CP problems. In 2015, the ASlib benchmarks were released for comparing AS systems coming from disparate fields (e.g., ASP, QBF, and SAT) and SUNNY was extended to deal with generic AS problems. This led to the development of sunny-as, a prototypical algorithm selector based on SUNNY for ASlib scenarios. A major improvement of sunny-as, called sunny-as2, was then submitted to the Open Algorithm Selection Challenge (OASC) in 2017, where it turned out to be the best approach for the runtime minimization of decision problems. In this work we present the technical advancements of sunny-as2, by detailing through several empirical evaluations and by providing new insights. Its current version, built on the top of the preliminary version submitted to OASC, is able to outperform sunny-as and other state-of-the-art AS methods, including those who did not attend the challenge.
Tong Liu 0004, Roberto Amadini, Maurizio Gabbrielli, Jacopo Mauro
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2017 NightSplitter: A Scheduling Tool to Optimize (Sub)group Activities
Tong Liu 0004, Roberto Di Cosmo, Maurizio Gabbrielli, Jacopo Mauro
CP1
2015 Feature Selection for SUNNY: A Study on the Algorithm Selection Library
abstract
Given a collection of algorithms, the Algorithm Selection (AS) problem consists in identifying which of them is the best one for solving a given problem. The selection depends on a set of numerical features that characterize the problem to solve. In this paper we show the impact of feature selection techniques on the performance of the SUNNY algorithm selector, taking as reference the benchmarks of the AS library (ASlib). Results indicate that a handful of features is enough to reach similar, if not better, performance of the original SUNNY approach that uses all the available features. We also present sunny-as: a tool for using SUNNY on a generic ASlib scenario.
Roberto Amadini, Fabio Biselli, Maurizio Gabbrielli, Tong Liu 0004, Jacopo Mauro
ICTAI4