Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Linda L. King

dblp:36/5784 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault diagnosis › system-level diagnosis
comparison-based diagnosis		 0.011987
The Comparison Approach to Multiprocessor Fault Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault diagnosis		 0.011987
The Comparison Approach to Multiprocessor Fault Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault diagnosis
system-level diagnosis		 0.011987
The Comparison Approach to Multiprocessor Fault Diagnosis · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 The Comparison Approach to Multiprocessor Fault Diagnosis
abstract
In this correspondence a system-level, comparison-based strategy for identifying faulty processors in a multiprocessor system is described. Unlike other strategies which have been proposed in the literature, the comparison approach is more efficient and relies on more realistic assumptions about the system under consideration. The new strategy is shown to correctly identify the set of faulty processors with a remarkably high probability, making it an attractive and viable addition or alternative to present fault diagnosis techniques.
Anton T. Dahbura, Krishan K. Sabnani, Linda L. King
 IEEE Trans. Computers3