Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Daniel P. Malley

dblp:36/5867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Optical networks · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Optical networks › optical access network
fiber optic subscriber loop		 0.011992
Fiber in the Loop: Where and When is it Feasible? · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992
Optical networks › optical transmission
SONET		 0.011992
Fiber in the Loop: Where and When is it Feasible? · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cost modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Fiber in the Loop: Where and When is it Feasible?
abstract
The feasibility of fiber-in-the-loop (FITL) is analyzed, dividing the local loop into four segments based on density: the urban business area, the urban residential area, suburban new growth areas, and a rural allocation area. A cost model is constructed around key network elements using realistic prices found in the marketplace. This model takes into account the impact of the synchronous optical network (SONET), remote powering issues, and network upgradability to broadband services. As a means to determine the feasibility of FITL in the future, the cost models of the network elements are subject to projected industry cost trends, and the analysis is repeated for three different points in time (1992, 1995, and 1998) to account for price reductions due to experience. Regulatory issues and their impact on the economic feasibility of FITL are also analyzed.>
Daniel P. Malley, Ozan K. Tonguz
 IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1