Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
G. T. Marth
dblp:36/5979
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › force control
impact control |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments · ICRA 1994 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments · ICRA 1994 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments · ICRA 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonlinear feedback control · 0.0impedance control · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and ExperimentsabstractA novel event based motion planning method, together with nonlinear feedback algorithm is applied to the controlled transition between unconstrained and constrained motion of a rigid robotic manipulator. The motion planner is driven by a task related scalar motion reference. This reference is a function of the actual manipulator position in the unconstrained directions and a function of the interaction force in the constrained directions. Impact is considered a discrete event, separating different operation modes. The dynamics of the arm is decoupled with respect to a path-relative representation of manipulator outputs. The feedback control law directly servos these outputs. The event based planning and control scheme was experimentally implemented for impact control and compared with impedance control and explicit force control.> G. T. Marth, Tzyh Jong Tarn, Antal K. Bejczy |
ICRA | 1 |
| 1991 | Experimental evaluation of the nonlinear feedback robot controllerabstractThe trajectory tracking performance of the nonlinear feedback controller based on differential geometric control theory was experimentally studied. The performance is compared to three other methods: independent joint proportional-derivative (PD) control, independent joint PD control with feedforward torque computations, and the computed torque method. In the nonlinear feedback controller, servo is in the task space. In the other three methods servo is in the joint space. Path planning is in the task space. Circular and straight line paths are considered. A sampling frequency of 200 Hz is used. The effect of sampling frequency on tracking error is studied for the nonlinear feedback control scheme. The performance of these methods was tested on a PUMA 560 arm. The trajectory tracking performance of the robot arm under the nonlinear feedback controller is comparable to that of the computed torque control schemes.> Tzyh Jong Tarn, S. Ganguly, Arvind K. Ramadorai, G. T. Marth, Antal K. Bejczy |
ICRA | 4 |