Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. T. Marth

dblp:36/5979 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › force control
impact control
0.011994
An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.011994
An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments · ICRA 1994
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011994
An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments · ICRA 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear feedback control · 0.0impedance control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 An Event Based Approach to Impact Control: Theory and Experiments
abstract
A novel event based motion planning method, together with nonlinear feedback algorithm is applied to the controlled transition between unconstrained and constrained motion of a rigid robotic manipulator. The motion planner is driven by a task related scalar motion reference. This reference is a function of the actual manipulator position in the unconstrained directions and a function of the interaction force in the constrained directions. Impact is considered a discrete event, separating different operation modes. The dynamics of the arm is decoupled with respect to a path-relative representation of manipulator outputs. The feedback control law directly servos these outputs. The event based planning and control scheme was experimentally implemented for impact control and compared with impedance control and explicit force control.>
G. T. Marth, Tzyh Jong Tarn, Antal K. Bejczy
ICRA1
1991 Experimental evaluation of the nonlinear feedback robot controller
abstract
The trajectory tracking performance of the nonlinear feedback controller based on differential geometric control theory was experimentally studied. The performance is compared to three other methods: independent joint proportional-derivative (PD) control, independent joint PD control with feedforward torque computations, and the computed torque method. In the nonlinear feedback controller, servo is in the task space. In the other three methods servo is in the joint space. Path planning is in the task space. Circular and straight line paths are considered. A sampling frequency of 200 Hz is used. The effect of sampling frequency on tracking error is studied for the nonlinear feedback control scheme. The performance of these methods was tested on a PUMA 560 arm. The trajectory tracking performance of the robot arm under the nonlinear feedback controller is comparable to that of the computed torque control schemes.>
Tzyh Jong Tarn, S. Ganguly, Arvind K. Ramadorai, G. T. Marth, Antal K. Bejczy
ICRA4