Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sreenivasa R. Gorti

dblp:36/6270 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.011998
An object-oriented representation for product and design processes · Comput. Aided Des. 1998
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.011998
An object-oriented representation for product and design processes · Comput. Aided Des. 1998
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation
0.011996
From symbol to form: a framework for conceptual design · Comput. Aided Des. 1996
Requirements engineering and software design › design process
conceptual design
0.011996
From symbol to form: a framework for conceptual design · Comput. Aided Des. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

object-oriented modeling · 0.0knowledge representation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 An object-oriented representation for product and design processes
abstract
We report on the development of a knowledge representation model, which is based on the SHARED object model reported in Shared Workspaces for Computer-Aided Collaborative Engineering (Wong, A. and Sriram, D., Technical Report, IESL 93-06, Intelligent Engineering Systems Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, March, 1993) and Research in Engineering Design (Wong, A. and Sriram, D., SHARED: An Information Model for Cooperative Product Development, 1993, Fall, 21-39). Our current model is implemented as a layered scheme, that incorporates both an evolving artifact and its associated design process. To represent artifacts as they evolve, we define objects recursively without a pre-defined granularity on this recursive decomposition. This eliminates the need for translations between levels of abstraction in the design process. The SHARED model extends traditional OOP in three ways: by allowing explicit relationship classes with inheritance hierarchies; by permitting constraints to be associated with objects and relationships; and by comparing `similar' objects at three different levels (form, function and behavior).
Sreenivasa R. Gorti, Ashok Gupta, Gerard Jounghyun Kim, Ram D. Sriram, Albert Wong
Comput. Aided Des.1
1996 From symbol to form: a framework for conceptual design
Sreenivasa R. Gorti, Ram D. Sriram
Comput. Aided Des.1