Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Julia Wolf

dblp:36/7989 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 41% Algorithms and data structures · 22% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
additive combinatorics
0.212014
Sampling-Based Proofs of Almost-Periodicity Results and Algorithmic Applications · ICALP (1) 2014
Computational complexity
learning theory
0.212014
Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems · SIAM J. Comput. 2014
Algorithms and data structures
sublinear algorithms
0.212014
Sampling-Based Proofs of Almost-Periodicity Results and Algorithmic Applications · ICALP (1) 2014
Computational complexity › boolean function analysis
fourier analysis of boolean functions
0.112011
Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems · FOCS 2011
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-muller codes
0.112011
Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems · FOCS 2011
Computational complexity
gowers norm
0.012011
Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems · FOCS 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quadratic forms · 0.2fourier analysis · 0.2local self-correction · 0.1goldreich-levin algorithm · 0.1additive combinatorics · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Self-Other Perspective Taking and the Development of Perspective Understanding
Julia Wolf
CogSci1
2021 The Role of Mindreading in a Pluralist Framework of Social Cognition
Julia Wolf, Sabrina Coninx
CogSci1
2014 Sampling-Based Proofs of Almost-Periodicity Results and Algorithmic Applications
abstract
28 pages
Eli Ben-Sasson, Noga Ron-Zewi, Madhur Tulsiani, Julia Wolf
ICALP (1)4
2014 Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems
Madhur Tulsiani, Julia Wolf
SIAM J. Comput.2
2011 Quadratic Goldreich-Levin Theorems
abstract
Decomposition theorems in classical Fourier analysis enable us to express a bounded function in terms of few linear phases with large Fourier coefficients plus a part that is pseudorandom with respect to linear phases. The Goldreich--Levin algorithm [O. Goldreich and L. Levin, “A Hard-Core Predicate for All One-Way Functions," in Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1989, pp. 25--32] can be viewed as an algorithmic analogue of such a decomposition as it gives a way to efficiently find the linear phases associated with large Fourier coefficients. In the study of “quadratic Fourier analysis,” higher-degree analogues of such decompositions have been developed in which the pseudorandomness property is stronger but the structured part is correspondingly weaker. For example, it has been shown that it is possible to express a bounded function as a sum of a few quadratic phases plus a part that is small in the $U^3$ norm, defined by Gowers for the purpose of counting arithmetic progressions of length 4. We give a polynomial time algorithm for computing such a decomposition. A key part of the algorithm is a local self-correction procedure for Reed--Muller codes of order 2 (over $\F_2^n$) for a function at distance $1/2-\e$ from a codeword. Given a function $f:\F_2^n \to \{-1,1\}$ at fractional Hamming distance $1/2-\e$ from a quadratic phase (which is a codeword of the Reed--Muller code of order 2), we give an algorithm that runs in time polynomial in $n$ and finds a codeword at distance at most $1/2-\eta$ for $\eta = \eta(\e)$. This is an algorithmic analogue of Samorodnitsky's result [A. Samorodnitsky, “Low-Degree Tests at Large Distances,” in Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2007, pp. 506--515], which gave a tester for the above problem. To our knowledge, it represents the first instance of a correction procedure for any class of codes, beyond the list-decoding radius. For this purpose, we give algorithmic versions of results from additive combinatorics used in Samorodnitsky's proof and a refined version of the inverse theorem for the Gowers $U^3$ norm over $\F_2^n$.
Madhur Tulsiani, Julia Wolf
FOCS2