Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

J. Benjamin Hutchinson

dblp:36/8256 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-2253-6204ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
factor analysis
0.412020
Neural Topographic Factor Analysis for fMRI Data · NeurIPS 2020
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › neuroimaging analysis
fMRI analysis
0.412020
Neural Topographic Factor Analysis for fMRI Data · NeurIPS 2020
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis
0.412020
Neural Topographic Factor Analysis for fMRI Data · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
embedding learning
0.112020
Neural Topographic Factor Analysis for fMRI Data · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.9factor analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Neural Topographic Factor Analysis for fMRI Data
abstract
Neuroimaging studies produce gigabytes of spatio-temporal data for a small number of participants and stimuli. Recent work increasingly suggests that the common practice of averaging across participants and stimuli leaves out systematic and meaningful information. We propose Neural Topographic Factor Analysis (NTFA), a probabilistic factor analysis model that infers embeddings for participants and stimuli. These embeddings allow us to reason about differences between participants and stimuli as signal rather than noise. We evaluate NTFA on data from an in-house pilot experiment, as well as two publicly available datasets. We demonstrate that inferring representations for participants and stimuli improves predictive generalization to unseen data when compared to previous topographic methods. We also demonstrate that the inferred latent factor representations are useful for downstream tasks such as multivoxel pattern analysis and functional connectivity.
Eli Sennesh, Zulqarnain Khan, J. Benjamin Hutchinson, Ajay B. Satpute, Jennifer G. Dy, Jan-Willem van de Meent
NeurIPS4