Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yongsheng Shen
dblp:36/8328
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 46% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 20% Network security · 13% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network measurement and analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network security
traffic analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MineShark: Cryptomining Traffic Detection at Scale · NDSS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack › data reconstruction attack
gradient leakage attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › federated learning privacy
gradient leakage defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Systems and software security › database security
encrypted database |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Frequency-revealing attacks against Frequency-hiding Order-preserving Encryption · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption › property-preserving encryption › order-preserving encryption
frequency-hiding order-preserving encryption |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Frequency-revealing attacks against Frequency-hiding Order-preserving Encryption · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
inference attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Frequency-revealing attacks against Frequency-hiding Order-preserving Encryption · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption › property-preserving encryption
order-preserving encryption |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Frequency-revealing attacks against Frequency-hiding Order-preserving Encryption · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Network measurement and analytics
traffic classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MineShark: Cryptomining Traffic Detection at Scale · NDSS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
privacy-preserving federated learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 1.7noise decay · 1.5gradient clipping · 1.5differential privacy · 1.5inference attack · 0.7ciphertext-only attack · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MineShark: Cryptomining Traffic Detection at Scale
Shaoke Xi, Tianyi Fu, Kai Bu, Zhihua Chang, Wenzhi Chen, Zhou Ma, Chongjie Chen, Yongsheng Shen, Kui Ren 0001 |
NDSS | 9 |
| 2024 | Shield Against Gradient Leakage Attacks: Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated LearningabstractFederated learning (FL) requires frequent uploading and updating of model parameters, which is naturally vulnerable to gradient leakage attacks (GLAs) that reconstruct private training data through gradients. Although some works incorporate differential privacy (DP) into FL to mitigate such privacy issues, their performance is not satisfactory since they did not notice that GLA incurs heterogeneous risks of privacy leakage (RoPL) with respect to gradients from different communication rounds and clients. In this paper, we propose an Adaptive Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning (Adp-PPFL) framework to achieve satisfactory privacy protection against GLA, while ensuring good performance in terms of model accuracy and convergence speed. Specifically, a leakage risk-aware privacy decomposition mechanism is proposed to provide adaptive privacy protection to different communication rounds and clients by dynamically allocating the privacy budget according to the quantified RoPL. In particular, we exploratively design a round-level and a client-level RoPL quantification method to measure the possible risks of GLA breaking privacy from gradients in different communication rounds and clients respectively, which only employ the limited information in general FL settings. Furthermore, to improve the FL model training performance (i.e., convergence speed and global model accuracy), we propose an adaptive privacy-preserving local training mechanism that dynamically clips the gradients and decays the noises added to the clipped gradients during the local training process. Extensive experiments show that our framework outperforms the existing differentially private FL schemes on model accuracy, convergence, and attack resistance. Jiahui Hu 0001, Zhibo Wang 0001, Yongsheng Shen, Bohan Lin, Peng Sun 0003, Xiaoyi Pang, Jian Liu 0012, Kui Ren 0001 |
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. | 3 |
| 2023 | Frequency-revealing attacks against Frequency-hiding Order-preserving EncryptionabstractOrder-preserving encryption (OPE) allows efficient comparison operations over encrypted data and thus is popular in encrypted databases. However, most existing OPE schemes are vulnerable to inference attacks as they leak plaintext frequency. To this end, some frequency-hiding order-preserving encryption (FH-OPE) schemes are proposed and claim to prevent the leakage of frequency. FH-OPE schemes are considered an important step towards mitigating inference attacks. Unfortunately, there are still vulnerabilities in all existing FH-OPE schemes. In this work, we revisit the security of all existing FH-OPE schemes. We are the first to demonstrate that plaintext frequency hidden by them is recoverable. We present three ciphertext-only attacks named frequency-revealing attacks to recover plaintext frequency. We evaluate our attacks in three real-world datasets. They recover over 90% of plaintext frequency hidden by any existing FH-OPE scheme. With frequency revealed, we also show the potentiality to apply inference attacks on existing FH-OPE schemes. Our findings highlight the limitations of current FH-OPE schemes. Our attacks demonstrate that achieving frequency-hiding requires addressing the leakages of both non-uniform ciphertext distribution and insertion orders of ciphertexts, even though the leakage of insertion orders is always ignored in OPE. Xinle Cao, Jian Liu 0012, Yongsheng Shen, Xiaohua Ye, Kui Ren 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |