EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiale Lao
dblp:360/0992
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-1144-5152ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Database system architecture and tuning · 55% Query processing and optimization · 36% Machine learning and data management · 8% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% Systems and software security · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization
semantic query processing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SemBench: A Benchmark for Semantic Query Processing Engines · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are Your LLM-based Text-to-SQL Models Secure? Exploring SQL Injection via Backdoor Attacks · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Systems and software security › exploitation › injection attacks
SQL injection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Are Your LLM-based Text-to-SQL Models Secure? Exploring SQL Injection via Backdoor Attacks · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Database system architecture and tuning › configuration tuning
automatic configuration tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Database system architecture and tuning › configuration tuning
knob tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | IGenBench: Benchmarking the Reliability of Text-to-Infographic Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | SemBench: A Benchmark for Semantic Query Processing Engines · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2026 |
Machine learning and data management
learned database components |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark construction · 2.0poisoned fine-tuning · 0.9character-level triggers · 0.9backdoor attack · 0.9prompt ensemble · 0.8large language model · 0.8bayesian optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | IGenBench: Benchmarking the Reliability of Text-to-Infographic GenerationabstractYinghao Tang, Xueding Liu, Boyuan Zhang, Tingfeng Lan, Yupeng Xie, Jiale Lao, Yiyao Wang, Haoxuan Li, Tingting Gao, Bo Pan, Luoxuan Weng, Xiuqi Huang, Minfeng Zhu, Yingchaojie Feng, Yuyu Luo, Wei Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Yinghao Tang, Xueding Liu, Tingfeng Lan, Jiale Lao, Yiyao Wang, Tingting Gao, Bo Pan 0004, Luoxuan Weng, Xiuqi Huang, Minfeng Zhu 0001, Yingchaojie Feng, Yuyu Luo, Wei Chen 0001 |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2026 | SemBench: A Benchmark for Semantic Query Processing Engines
Jiale Lao, Andreas Zimmerer, Olga Ovcharenko, Tianji Cong, Matthew Russo, Gerardo Vitagliano, Michael Cochez, Fatma Özcan 0001, Gautam Gupta, Thibaud Hottelier, H. V. Jagadish, Kris Kissel, Sebastian Schelter, Andreas Kipf, Immanuel Trummer |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2025 | Are Your LLM-based Text-to-SQL Models Secure? Exploring SQL Injection via Backdoor AttacksabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have shown state-of-the-art results in translating natural language questions into SQL queries (Text-to-SQL), a long-standing challenge within the database community. However, security concerns remain largely unexplored, particularly the threat of backdoor attacks, which can introduce malicious behaviors into models through fine-tuning with poisoned datasets. In this work, we systematically investigate the vulnerabilities of LLM-based Text-to-SQL models and present ToxicSQL, a novel backdoor attack framework. Our approach leverages stealthy command-like and character-level triggers to make backdoors difficult to detect and remove, ensuring that malicious behaviors remain covert while maintaining high model accuracy on benign inputs. Furthermore, we propose leveraging SQL injection payloads as backdoor targets, enabling the generation of malicious yet executable SQL queries, which pose severe security and privacy risks in language model-based SQL development. We demonstrate that injecting only 0.44% of poisoned data can result in an attack success rate of 79.41%, posing a significant risk to database security. Additionally, we propose detection and mitigation strategies to enhance model reliability. Our findings highlight the urgent need for security-aware Text-to-SQL development, emphasizing the importance of robust defenses against backdoor threats. Meiyu Lin, Jiale Lao, Renyuan Li, Yuanchun Zhou, Carl Yang 0001, Yang Cao 0011, MingJie Tang |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 3 |
| 2024 | GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian OptimizationabstractModern database management systems (DBMS) expose hundreds of configurable knobs to control system behaviours. Determining the appropriate values for these knobs to improve DBMS performance is a long-standing problem in the database community. As there is an increasing number of knobs to tune and each knob could be in continuous or categorical values, manual tuning becomes impractical. Recently, automatic tuning systems using machine learning methods have shown great potentials. However, existing approaches still incur significant tuning costs or only yield sub-optimal performance. This is because they either ignore the extensive domain knowledge available (e.g., DBMS manuals and forum discussions) and only rely on the runtime feedback of benchmark evaluations to guide the optimization, or they utilize the domain knowledge in a limited way. Hence, we propose GPTuner, a manual-reading database tuning system that leverages domain knowledge extensively and automatically to optimize search space and enhance the runtime feedback-based optimization process. Firstly, we develop a Large Language Model (LLM)-based pipeline to collect and refine heterogeneous knowledge, and propose a prompt ensemble algorithm to unify a structured view of the refined knowledge. Secondly, using the structured knowledge, we (1) design a workload-aware and training-free knob selection strategy, (2) develop a search space optimization technique considering the value range of each knob, and (3) propose a Coarse-to-Fine Bayesian Optimization Framework to explore the optimized space. Finally, we evaluate GPTuner under different benchmarks (TPC-C and TPC-H), metrics (throughput and latency) as well as DBMS (PostgreSQL and MySQL). Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, GPTuner identifies better configurations in 16x less time on average. Moreover, GPTuner achieves up to 30% performance improvement (higher throughput or lower latency) over the best-performing alternative. Jiale Lao, Yibo Wang 0015, Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Wanghu Chen, MingJie Tang, Jianguo Wang 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |