EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sameeran Joshi
dblp:360/2604
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-0345-4235ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
scheduling language |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scheduling Language Chronology: Past, Present, and Future · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025 |
Compilers and program optimization
autotuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scheduling Language Chronology: Past, Present, and Future · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025 |
Compilers and program optimization › autotuning
iterative compilation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scheduling Language Chronology: Past, Present, and Future · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scheduling Language Chronology: Past, Present, and FutureabstractScheduling languages express to a compiler—or equivalently, a code generator—a sequence of optimizations to apply. Performance tools that support a scheduling language interface allow exploration of optimizations, i.e., exploratory compilers . While scheduling languages have become a common feature of tools for experts, the proliferation of these languages without unifying common features may be confusing to users. Moreover, we recognize a need to organize the compiler developer community around common exploratory compiler infrastructure, and future advances to address, for example, data layout and data movement. To support a broader set of users may require raising the level of abstraction. This article provides a chronology of scheduling languages, discussing their origins in iterative compilation and autotuning, noting the common features that are used in existing frameworks, and calling for changes to increase their utility and portability. Mary W. Hall, Cosmin E. Oancea, Anne C. Elster, Ari Rasch, Sameeran Joshi, Amir Mohammad Tavakkoli, Richard Schulze |
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. | 5 |