Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huifa Li
dblp:360/4536
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 71% Graph learning · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 11% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 67% Privacy and data protection · 33% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FedCD: Towards Consolidated Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learning · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | FedCD: Towards Consolidated Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learning · AAAI 2026 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated graph learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | EC-LDA: Label Distribution Inference Attack Against Federated Graph Learning with Embedding Compression · ICDM 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › federated learning security
federated learning attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | EC-LDA: Label Distribution Inference Attack Against Federated Graph Learning with Embedding Compression · ICDM 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
privacy attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | EC-LDA: Label Distribution Inference Attack Against Federated Graph Learning with Embedding Compression · ICDM 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | EC-LDA: Label Distribution Inference Attack Against Federated Graph Learning with Embedding Compression · ICDM 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | EC-LDA: Label Distribution Inference Attack Against Federated Graph Learning with Embedding Compression · ICDM 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient analysis · 1.7embedding compression · 1.7logit-based distillation · 1.0gaussian mixture model · 1.0feature-based distillation · 1.0cross-layer attention · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FedCD: Towards Consolidated Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated LearningabstractKnowledge Distillation (KD) serves as an effective approach to addressing heterogeneity issues in Federated Learning (FL), leveraging additional datasets to align local and global models better. There are two primary distillation paradigms: feature-based distillation, which utilizes intermediate-layer features of the network, and logit-based distillation, which employs the final layer's logit outputs. However, existing studies often select distillation methods based on intuitive and empirical evidence when facing different heterogeneous settings, neglecting the intrinsic relationship between distillation paradigms and heterogeneity. This oversight may result in suboptimal federated knowledge distillation performance under heterogeneous conditions. In this paper, we propose the Consolidated Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learning - FedCD that balances knowledge representations from both feature-based and logit-based distillation to enhance performance. Specifically, to address the misalignment between knowledge conveyed by features and logits, we aggregate features from different layers via cross-layer attention to preserve semantic knowledge, followed by distribution modeling using Gaussian Mixture Models. This process strengthens knowledge distillation by constraining the transformation of different network layers' features under a consolidated distribution, thereby mitigating impacts from both data and model heterogeneity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FedCD outperforms state-of-the-art methods by over 10.72% and validate the effectiveness of our approach. Yichen Li 0006, Huifa Li, Xinlin Zhuang, Haochen Xue, Haozhao Wang, Muhammad Imran Razzak |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2026 | FedFDP: Fairness-Aware Federated Learning with Differential Privacy
Xinpeng Ling, Jie Fu 0003, Kuncan Wang, Huifa Li, Tong Cheng |
ACNS (2) | 4 |
| 2025 | EC-LDA: Label Distribution Inference Attack Against Federated Graph Learning with Embedding CompressionabstractGraph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for graph analysis. Federated Graph Learning (FGL) is an emerging learning framework to collaboratively train graph data from various clients. Although FGL allows client data to remain localized, a malicious server can still steal client private data information through uploaded gradient. In this paper, we for the first time propose label distribution attacks (LDAs11The term “LDA” here is different from other machine learning terms like Latent Dirichlet Allocation.) on FGL that aim to infer the label distributions of the client-side data. Firstly, we observe that the effectiveness of LDA is closely related to the variance of node embeddings in GNNs. Next, we analyze the relation between them and propose a new attack named ECLDA, which significantly improves the attack effectiveness by compressing node embeddings. Then, extensive experiments on node classification and link prediction tasks across six widely used graph datasets show that EC-LDA outperforms the SOTA LDAs. Specifically, EC-LDA can achieve the Cos-sim as high as 1.0 under almost all cases. Finally, we explore the robustness of EC-LDA under differential privacy protection and discuss the potential effective defense methods to EC-LDA. Our code is available at https://github.com/cheng-t/EC-LDA. Tong Cheng, Jie Fu 0003, Xinpeng Ling, Huifa Li, Haifeng Qian, Junqing Gong 0001 |
ICDM | 4 |
| 2024 | Single-cell Curriculum Learning-based Deep Graph Embedding ClusteringabstractThe swift advancement of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies enables the investigation of cellular-level tissue heterogeneity. Cell annotation significantly contributes to the extensive downstream analysis of scRNA-seq data. However, The analysis of scRNA-seq for biological inference presents challenges owing to its intricate and indeterminate data distribution, characterized by a substantial volume and a high frequency of dropout events. Furthermore, the quality of training samples varies greatly, and the performance of the popular scRNA-seq data clustering solution GNN could be harmed by two types of low-quality training nodes: 1) nodes on the boundary; 2) nodes that contribute little additional information to the graph. To address these problems, we propose a single-cell curriculum learning-based deep graph embedding clustering (scCLG). We first propose a Chebyshev graph convolutional autoencoder with multi-criteria (ChebAE) that combines three optimization objectives, including topology reconstruction loss of cell graphs, zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) loss, and clustering loss, to learn cell-cell topology representation. Meanwhile, we employ a selective training strategy to train GNN based on the features and entropy of nodes and prune the difficult nodes based on the difficulty scores to keep the high-quality graph. Empirical results on a variety of gene expression datasets show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods. The code of scCLG will be made publicly available at https://github.com/LFD-byte/scCLG. Huifa Li, Jie Fu 0003, Xinpeng Ling, Zhiyu Sun 0001, Kuncan Wang |
BIBM | 1 |