Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mostafa Saeed

dblp:360/4890 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 87% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
lemmatization
0.912025
Lemmatization as a Classification Task: Results from Arabic across Multiple Genres · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological tagging
0.912025
Lemmatization as a Classification Task: Results from Arabic across Multiple Genres · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic clustering · 0.9machine translation · 0.9classification · 0.9character-level sequence-to-sequence models · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Lemmatization as a Classification Task: Results from Arabic across Multiple Genres
abstract
Lemmatization is crucial for NLP tasks in morphologically rich languages with ambiguous orthography like Arabic, but existing tools face challenges due to inconsistent standards and limited genre coverage.This paper introduces two novel approaches that frame lemmatization as classification into a Lemma-POS-Gloss (LPG) tagset, leveraging machine translation and semantic clustering.We also present a new Arabic lemmatization test set covering diverse genres, standardized alongside existing datasets.We evaluate character-level sequenceto-sequence models, which perform competitively and offer complementary value, but are limited to lemma prediction (not LPG) and prone to hallucinating implausible forms.Our results show that classification and clustering yield more robust, interpretable outputs, setting new benchmarks for Arabic lemmatization.Data/tool
Mostafa Saeed, Nizar Habash
EMNLP1