Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Telem Nachum

dblp:360/5081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-6813-8562ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 54% Network security · 46%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › attack modeling
attack graph
1.012026
MIRAGE: Multi-Binary Image Risk Assessment With Attack Graph Employment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Network security › attack modeling
attack path analysis
1.012026
MIRAGE: Multi-Binary Image Risk Assessment With Attack Graph Employment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Systems and software security
firmware security
1.012026
MIRAGE: Multi-Binary Image Risk Assessment With Attack Graph Employment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Systems and software security
vulnerability analysis
1.012026
MIRAGE: Multi-Binary Image Risk Assessment With Attack Graph Employment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026
Systems and software security
supply chain security
0.312026
MIRAGE: Multi-Binary Image Risk Assessment With Attack Graph Employment · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

attack graph generation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 MIRAGE: Multi-Binary Image Risk Assessment With Attack Graph Employment
abstract
Attackers can exploit known vulnerabilities to infiltrate a device's firmware and the communication between firmware binaries in order to pass between them. To improve cybersecurity, organizations must identify and mitigate the risks of the firmware they use. An attack graph (AG) can be used to assess and visually display firmware's risks by organizing the identified vulnerabilities into attack paths composed of sequences of actions attackers may perform to compromise firmware images. In this paper, we utilize AGs for firmware risk assessment. We propose MIRAGE (Multi-binary Image Risk Assessment with Attack Graph Employment), a framework for identifying potential attack vectors and vulnerable interactions between firmware binaries; MIRAGE accomplishes this by generating AGs for firmware inter-binary communication. To evaluate the MIRAGE framework, we collected a dataset of 1,343 firmware images. We propose models for examining the risks of firmware binaries and attack paths, demonstrate their implementation on the dataset of firmware images, and list the riskiest binaries. We present a case study with a detailed description of an actual attack implementation on a selected firmware from the dataset. The use cases of the proposed framework include identifying risky external interactions, assessing supply chain risks, and analyzing security with digital twins.
David Tayouri, Telem Nachum, Asaf Shabtai
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.2