Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kuancheng Wang
dblp:360/7061
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% Learning paradigms · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What Matters in Learning from Large-Scale Datasets for Robot Manipulation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What Matters in Learning from Large-Scale Datasets for Robot Manipulation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | What Matters in Learning from Large-Scale Datasets for Robot Manipulation · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
procedural data generation · 0.9imitation learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | What Matters in Learning from Large-Scale Datasets for Robot ManipulationabstractImitation learning from large multi-task demonstration datasets has emerged as a promising path for building generally-capable robots. As a result, 1000s of hours have been spent on building such large-scale datasets around the globe. Despite the continuous growth of such efforts, we still lack a systematic understanding of what data should be collected to improve the utility of a robotics dataset and facilitate downstream policy learning. In this work, we conduct a large-scale dataset composition study to answer this question. We develop a data generation framework to procedurally emulate common sources of diversity in existing datasets (such as sensor placements and object types and arrangements), and use it to generate large-scale robot datasets with controlled compositions, enabling a suite of dataset composition studies that would be prohibitively expensive in the real world. We focus on two practical settings: (1) what types of diversity should be emphasized when future researchers collect large-scale datasets for robotics, and (2) how should current practitioners retrieve relevant demonstrations from existing datasets to maximize downstream policy performance on tasks of interest. Our study yields several critical insights -- for example, we find that camera poses and spatial arrangements are crucial dimensions for both diversity in collection and alignment in retrieval. In real-world robot learning settings, we find that not only do our insights from simulation carry over, but our retrieval strategies on existing datasets such as DROID allow us to consistently outperform existing training strategies by up to 70\%. Vaibhav Saxena, Matthew Bronars, Nadun Ranawaka Arachchige, Kuancheng Wang, Woo-Chul Shin, Soroush Nasiriany, Ajay Mandlekar, Danfei Xu |
ICLR | 4 |