Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Polong Chen

dblp:360/7625 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-6025-0567ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 51% Automated reasoning and model checking · 49%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
1.422024
Learning to Check LTL Satisfiability and to Generate Traces via Differentiable Trace Checking · ISSTA 2024
SAT-Verifiable LTL Satisfiability Checking via Graph Representation Learning · ASE 2023
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
linear temporal logic
0.922024
SAT-Verifiable LTL Satisfiability Checking via Graph Representation Learning · ASE 2023
Learning to Check LTL Satisfiability and to Generate Traces via Differentiable Trace Checking · ISSTA 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
LTL satisfiability checking
0.812024
Learning to Check LTL Satisfiability and to Generate Traces via Differentiable Trace Checking · ISSTA 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.712023
SAT-Verifiable LTL Satisfiability Checking via Graph Representation Learning · ASE 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 1.4gradient descent · 0.8differentiable trace checking · 0.8graph representation learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning to Check LTL Satisfiability and to Generate Traces via Differentiable Trace Checking
abstract
Linear temporal logic (LTL) satisfiability checking has a high complexity, i.e., PSPACE-complete. Recently, neural networks have been shown to be promising in approximately checking LTL satisfiability in polynomial time. However, there is still a lack of neural network-based approach to the problem of checking LTL satisfiability and generating traces as evidence, simply called SAT-and-GET, where a satisfiable trace is generated as evidence if the given LTL formula is detected to be satisfiable. In this paper, we tackle SAT-and-GET via bridging LTL trace checking to neural network inference. Our key theoretical contribution is to show that a well-designed neural inference process, named after neural trace checking, is able to simulate LTL trace checking. We present a neural network-based approach VSCNet. Relying on the differentiable neural trace checking, VSCNet is able to learn both to check satisfiability and to generate traces via gradient descent. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of VSCNet, showing that it significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art (SOTA) neural network-based approaches for trace generation, on average achieving up to 41.68% improvement in semantic accuracy. Besides, compared with the SOTA logic-based approach nuXmv and Aalta, VSCNet achieves averagely 186X and 3541X speedups on large-scale datasets, respectively.
Weilin Luo, Pingjia Liang, Junming Qiu, Polong Chen, Hai Wan, Jianfeng Du, Weiyuan Fang
ISSTA4
2024 Goal-conflict identification based on local search and fast boundary-condition verification based on incremental satisfiability filter
Weilin Luo, Polong Chen, Hai Wan, Hongzhen Zhong, Shaowei Cai 0001, Zhanhao Xiao
J. Syst. Softw.2
2023 SAT-Verifiable LTL Satisfiability Checking via Graph Representation Learning
abstract
With the superior learning ability of neural networks, it is promising to obtain highly confident results for linear temporal logic (LTL) satisfiability checking in polynomial time. However, existing neural approaches are limited in inductive ability and in supporting with an arbitrary number of atomic propositions. Besides, there is no mechanism to verify the results for satisfiability checking. In this paper, we propose an approach to checking the satisfiability of an LTL formula and meanwhile generating a satisfiable trace if the LTL formula is satisfiable, where the satisfiable trace verifies the satisfiability result. The core contribution is a new graph representation for LTL formulae - one-step unfolded graph (OSUG) to incorporate the syntax and semantic features of LTL. Preliminary results show that our approach is superior to the state-of-the-art neural approaches on synthetic datasets and confirms the effectiveness of OSUG.
Weilin Luo, Rongzhen Ye, Hai Wan, Jianfeng Du, Pingjia Liang, Polong Chen
ASE7