Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xujian Cai

dblp:361/0233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Vision and language · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
concept matching
0.712023
Matching Words for Out-of-distribution Detection · ICDM 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field
0.712023
Matching Words for Out-of-distribution Detection · ICDM 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.712023
Matching Words for Out-of-distribution Detection · ICDM 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Matching Words for Out-of-distribution Detection · ICDM 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.712023
Matching Words for Out-of-distribution Detection · ICDM 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wordnet · 0.7conditional random field · 0.7CLIP · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Matching Words for Out-of-distribution Detection
abstract
Deep neural networks often exhibit the overconfidence issue when encountering out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. To address this, leveraging large-scale pre-trained models like CLIP has shown promise. While CLIP has the capability to encode a vast array of interconnected concepts, current OOD detection methods based on it primarily focus on ID categories and a limited set of OOD categories. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that harnesses the power of WordNet to fully exploit the rich knowledge encapsulated within CLIP, resulting in enhanced OOD detection performance. Our methodology involves constructing a word tree that includes both in-distribution (ID) words and a large set of semantically similar OOD words selected from WordNet. By matching a test image with the concepts of the words in the word tree using CLIP, we estimate the probability of the image being classified as either ID or OOD. Furthermore, we introduce a conditional random field model to effectively handle both the parent-child and the sibling-sibling conflicts in the concept matching results. Extensive experiments under various ID/OOD settings demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and its superiority over state-of-the-art methods.
Keke Tang, Xujian Cai, Weilong Peng, Daizong Liu, Peican Zhu, Pan Zhou 0001, Zhihong Tian 0001, Wenping Wang 0001
ICDM2
2023 OOD Attack: Generating Overconfident out-of-Distribution Examples to Fool Deep Neural Classifiers
abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are dominating various computer vision solutions. However, DNN classifiers suffer from the out-of-distribution (OOD) overconfidence issue, i.e., making overconfident predictions on OOD samples. In this paper, we consider a new OOD attack task, i.e., generating OOD examples that fool DNN classifiers to trap into this issue. Specifically, we first generate seed examples by sampling from common OOD distributions, and then lift the prediction to be overconfident. Extensive experiments with different seeds and confidence-lifting solutions under white-and black-box settings validate the feasibility of OOD attack. Besides, we demonstrate its usefulness in evaluating OOD detection and alleviating the OOD overconfidence issue.
Keke Tang, Xujian Cai, Weilong Peng, Shudong Li, Wenping Wang 0001
ICIP2